Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39700439›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2025

Radiographic and visual response to the type II RAF inhibitor tovorafenib in children with relapsed/refractory optic pathway glioma in the FIREFLY-1 trial.

Karsten Nysom, Lindsay B Kilburn, Sarah E S Leary, Daniel B Landi, Evelien de Vos-Kerkhof, Sébastien Perreault, Olaf Witt, David S Ziegler, Pablo Hernáiz Driever, Andrea T Franson and 19 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

Karsten NysomDepartment of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Capital Region of Denmark, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-2935-0058
Lindsay B KilburnChildren's National Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
Sarah E S LearyCancer and Blood Disorders Center, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0225-6184
Daniel B LandiDepartment of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Evelien de Vos-KerkhofPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sébastien PerreaultCHU Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Olaf WittNational Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
David S ZieglerSchool of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Pablo Hernáiz DrieverDepartment of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität Berlin, German HIT-LOGGIC-Registry for LGG in Children and Adolescents, Pediatric Neurooncology Program, Berlin, Germany.
Andrea T FransonDepartment of Pediatrics, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Patricia A BaxterTexas Children's Cancer Center, Texas Children's Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3703-8742
Nicholas S WhipplePrimary Children's Hospital and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Cassie KlineDivision of Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7765-7690
Devorah SegalNYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.
Nada JabadoDepartment of Pediatrics, McGill University Health Centre (MUHC), The Montreal Children's Hospital (MCH), Montréal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2485-3692
Simon BaileyGreat North Children's Hospital and Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.
Geoffrey McCowageSydney Children's Hospitals Network, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
Jordan R HansfordSouth Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Dong-Anh Khuong-QuangChildren's Cancer Centre, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nicholas G GottardoBrain Tumor Research Program, Telethon Kids Cancer Centre, Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Washington, Australia.
Timothy HassallChildren's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, Australia.
Jung Woo HanSeverance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-8936-1205
Michal Yalon OrenPediatric Hemato-Oncology Department, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Tel Aviv District, Israel.
Susan N ChiPediatric Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7753-878X
Jiaheng QiuDay One Biopharmaceuticals, Brisbane, California, USA.
Daniel Da CostaDay One Biopharmaceuticals, Brisbane, California, USA.
Sandya Govinda RajuDay One Biopharmaceuticals, Brisbane, California, USA.
Peter ManleyDay One Biopharmaceuticals, Brisbane, California, USA.
Darren HargraveUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health and Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK.

Funding

Day One Biopharmaceuticals, Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to their anatomical locations, optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) can rarely be cured by resection. Given the importance of preserving visual function, we analyzed radiological and visual acuity (VA) outcomes for the type II RAF inhibitor tovorafenib in the OPG subgroup of the phase 2 FIREFLY-1 trial.

methodsFIREFLY-1 investigated the efficacy (arm 1, n = 77), safety, and tolerability (arms 1/2) of tovorafenib (420 mg/m2 once weekly; 600 mg maximum) in patients with BRAF-altered relapsed/refractory pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG). In this post hoc analysis, anti-tumor activity and VA were analyzed in arm 1 patients with OPG. Anti-tumor activity was independently assessed per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology high-grade glioma (RANO-HGG), Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology-LGG (RAPNO), and RANO-LGG criteria. The data cutoff was June 5, 2023.

resultsForty-two of 77 patients had OPGs; 35 of 42 had ≥2 VA assessments. The overall response rate in the OPG subgroup according to RANO-HGG, RAPNO, and RANO-LGG criteria were 64%, 50%, and 55%, with clinical benefit rates of 95%, 88%, and 90%, respectively. VA per patient was preserved for 80% of patients; 31% demonstrated improved VA; VA per eye was preserved in 87%, with 27% improving. The safety profile in the arm 1 OPG subgroup was similar to the overall FIREFLY-1 safety analysis set.

conclusionsTovorafenib demonstrated anti-tumor activity in relapsed/refractory BRAF-altered OPG across radiological assessment criteria and was generally well tolerated. Importantly, vision remained stable or improved in most patients.

Indexed as

Neoplasm Recurrence, LocalOptic Nerve GliomaProtein Kinase InhibitorsVisual AcuityAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePrognosisProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAF protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafBRAFFIREFLY-1optic pathway gliomatovorafenibvisual acuity

Identifiers

PMID39700439
PMCPMC12187376

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.