ArticleTransplantation and cellular therapy2025
Letermovir for Prevention of Recurrent Cytomegalovirus in High-Risk Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Recipients.
Article in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We evaluated letermovir (LTV) for secondary prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus (CMV) in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients (HCT) at high-risk for CMV recurrence. This open-label study was conducted at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and the University of Minnesota. Patients with clinically significant CMV infection (cs-CMVi) and ≥1 high-risk criteria for CMV who achieved viral suppression with standard CMV antivirals received LTV secondary prophylaxis for up to 14 weeks. The primary endpoint was cs-CMVi at week 14; secondary endpoints included LTV resistance, CMV end-organ disease (EOD), CMV-related death, and LTV-related adverse events at week 14. Thirty-six patients were analyzed (CMV seropositive, n = 33; T cell-depleted HCT, n = 25; cord blood allograft, n = 5). By week 14 post-transplantation, 5 patients met the primary endpoint of cs-CMVi, for a cumulative incidence of 14.9% (95% confidence interval, 2.6% to 27.1%). Four patients developed LTV breakthrough cs-CMVi (including 2 patients with confirmed LTV resistance). The remaining patient developed rebound cs-CMVi after premature discontinuation of LTV due to enrollment in a clinical trial. There were no cases of CMV EOD, CMV-related death, or LTV-related adverse events by week 14 or by week 24. Our data support that LTV secondary prophylaxis is safe and effective in high-risk HCT recipients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.