Trial reportJournal of affective disorders2025
Rumination induction task in fMRI: Effects of rumination focused cognitive behavioral therapy and stability in youth.
Trial report in Journal of affective disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural Circuit Taxonomy and Precision Psychiatry in Major Depression.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026Review
- Neuroimaging and Emotional Development in the Pediatric Population: Understanding the Link Between the Brain, Emotions, and Behavior.Pediatric reports · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRumination is implicated in the onset and maintenance of major depressive disorder (MDD). Rumination-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (RF-CBT) effectively targets rumination and may change resting-state brain connectivity and change in activation during a rumination induction task (RIT) post-intervention predicts depressive symptoms two years later. We examined brain activation changes during an RIT in adolescents with remitted MDD following RF-CBT and evaluated RIT reliability (or stability) during treatment as usual (TAU).
methodFifty-five adolescents ages 14-17 completed an RIT at baseline, were randomized to 10-14 sessions of RF-CBT (n = 30) or treatment as usual (n = 25) and completed an RIT at post-treatment or equivalent time delay. The RIT includes recalling negative memories (Rumination Instruction), dwelling on their meaning/consequences (Rumination Prompt), and imagining unrelated scenes and objects (Distraction). We assessed activation change in the RF-CBT group using paired-samples t-tests. We assessed reliability (or stability) via intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) of five rumination-related ROIs for TAU and RF-CBT separately across task blocks.
resultsFollowing treatment, participants receiving RF-CBT demonstrated increased activation of left precuneus during Rumination Instruction and of left angular and superior temporal gyri during Rumination Prompt blocks (p < .01). From baseline to post-treatment, across most ROIs and task blocks, the RF-CBT group demonstrated poor stability (M = 0.21, range = -0.19-0.69), while the TAU group demonstrated fair-to-excellent stability (M = 0.52, range = 0.27-0.86).
conclusionRF-CBT changes activation of rumination-related circuitry during state-induced rumination, offering exciting avenues for future interventions. The RIT has fair-to-excellent stability among individuals not explicitly treated for rumination, and as expected, RIT stability is disrupted by RF-CBT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.