ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Bayesian unsupervised clustering identifies clinically relevant osteosarcoma subtypes.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Post-treatment late and long-term effects in bone sarcoma: A scoping review.Journal of bone oncology · 2025Review
- Correlation of multiple peripheral blood parameters with metastasis and invasion of papillary thyroid cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Endocrine · 2025Article
- Targeting metastasis in paediatric bone sarcomas.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Exploratory Analysis of Molecular Subtypes in Early-Stage Osteosarcoma: Identifying Resistance and Optimizing Therapy.Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identification of cancer subtypes is a critical step for developing precision medicine. Most cancer subtyping is based on the analysis of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data from patient cohorts using unsupervised machine learning methods such as hierarchical cluster analysis, but these computational approaches disregard the heterogeneous composition of individual cancer samples. Here, we used a more sophisticated unsupervised Bayesian model termed latent process decomposition (LPD), which handles individual cancer sample heterogeneity and deconvolutes the structure of transcriptome data to provide clinically relevant information. The work was performed on the pediatric tumor osteosarcoma, which is a prototypical model for a rare and heterogeneous cancer. The LPD model detected three osteosarcoma subtypes. The subtype with the poorest prognosis was validated using independent patient datasets. This new stratification framework will be important for more accurate diagnostic labeling, expediting precision medicine, and improving clinical trial success. Our results emphasize the importance of using more sophisticated machine learning approaches (and for teaching deep learning and artificial intelligence) for RNA-seq data analysis, which may assist drug targeting and clinical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.