Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39701601›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

Bayesian unsupervised clustering identifies clinically relevant osteosarcoma subtypes.

Sergio Llaneza-Lago, William D Fraser, Darrell Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sergio Llaneza-LagoBiomedical Research Centre, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.
William D FraserBioanalytical Facility, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7UQ, United Kingdom.
Darrell GreenBiomedical Research Centre, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0217-3322

Funding

CHILDREN with CANCER UK 21-343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of cancer subtypes is a critical step for developing precision medicine. Most cancer subtyping is based on the analysis of RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data from patient cohorts using unsupervised machine learning methods such as hierarchical cluster analysis, but these computational approaches disregard the heterogeneous composition of individual cancer samples. Here, we used a more sophisticated unsupervised Bayesian model termed latent process decomposition (LPD), which handles individual cancer sample heterogeneity and deconvolutes the structure of transcriptome data to provide clinically relevant information. The work was performed on the pediatric tumor osteosarcoma, which is a prototypical model for a rare and heterogeneous cancer. The LPD model detected three osteosarcoma subtypes. The subtype with the poorest prognosis was validated using independent patient datasets. This new stratification framework will be important for more accurate diagnostic labeling, expediting precision medicine, and improving clinical trial success. Our results emphasize the importance of using more sophisticated machine learning approaches (and for teaching deep learning and artificial intelligence) for RNA-seq data analysis, which may assist drug targeting and clinical management.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremOsteosarcomaUnsupervised Machine LearningBone NeoplasmsCluster AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingHumansPrognosisTranscriptomeheterogeneitylatent process decompositionosteosarcomaprecision medicineRNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID39701601
PMCPMC11658815

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.