Evidence mapPaperPMID 39702012Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2024

General practitioners experience multi-level barriers to implementing recommended care for hip and knee osteoarthritis: a qualitative study.

Alison J Gibbs, Christian J Barton, Nicholas F Taylor, Joanne L Kemp, Jason A Wallis, Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis, Allison M Ezzat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alison J GibbsLa Trobe Sports and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia. a.gibbs@latrobe.edu.au.
Christian J BartonLa Trobe Sports and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Nicholas F TaylorDepartment of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Joanne L KempLa Trobe Sports and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Jason A WallisDepartment of Physiotherapy, Podiatry, Prosthetics and Orthotics, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Jo-Anne Manski-NankervisPrimary Care and Family Medicine, Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
Allison M EzzatLa Trobe Sports and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) play a key role in managing osteoarthritis, including referring to appropriate management services. Physiotherapist-led osteoarthritis management programs and advanced practice triage services are effective, but GPs views on them are largely unknown. This study aimed to explore general practitioner perspectives on: (1) managing patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis, and (2) physiotherapy-led osteoarthritis care and referral pathways.

methodsInterview topic guides were developed based on the theoretical domains framework. Twenty-five semi-structured interviews with GPs were conducted. All data were coded independently by at least two researchers and analysed inductively using thematic analysis, with barrier themes mapped to the socioecological model.

resultsTwo interrelated themes were identified: (i) GPs had good general knowledge of recommended osteoarthritis care, but (ii) they faced multi-level challenges facilitating or directly providing evidence-based care. Nearly all GPs identified exercise as first-line care and surgery as a last resort. Most were aware imaging was not required to diagnose osteoarthritis, yet reported often referring for imaging. Many GPs expressed challenges facilitating patient engagement in physiotherapy due to patient, environmental/social and system level barriers. Key barriers included: perceived patient expectations and lack of motivation to attend physiotherapy, a lack of knowledge of available physiotherapy services, a lack of affordable physiotherapy services, and lengthy waiting times for public orthopaedic appointments. Having private health insurance was perceived as an enabler.

conclusionsDespite having good knowledge of guideline-recommended care, GPs in our study experienced multi-level barriers to implementing this care in practice. Public health information and strategies to address patient's beliefs and lack of motivation to exercise may help reduce barriers to engaging in appropriate care. Urgent health system funding reforms are needed to allow GPs to appropriately manage patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PractitionersOsteoarthritis, HipOsteoarthritis, KneeQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationAdultFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPhysical Therapy ModalitiesBarriersGeneral practitionerOsteoarthritis managementPhysiotherapyQualitative

Identifiers

PMID39702012
PMCPMC11657540

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.