ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2024
Predicting Early recurrence of atrial fibrilation post-catheter ablation using machine learning techniques.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictive factors for atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency ablation: a multifactorial approach.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Comparative study of 11 machine learning algorithms for predicting recurrence risk after atrial fibrillation catheter ablation based on a real-world cohort: a retrospective study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Efficacy of rhBNP in heart failure with atrial fibrillation combined with poor conventional therapy response and recurrence risk factors.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Atrial fibrillation type-specific prediction of recurrence after catheter ablation: the pivotal role of right atrial remodeling revealed by explainable machine learning.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning models of inflammatory markers used in the prediction of early and late atrial fibrillation recurrence in overweight and obese patients after catheter ablation.Cardiology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCatheter ablation is a common treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF), but recurrence rates remain variable. Predicting the success of catheter ablation is crucial for patient selection and management. This research seeks to create a machine learning model to forecast the early recurrence of atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation.
methodsA prospective longitudinal study was conducted using data from the Iranian AF registry. The dataset included 402 consecutive AF patients who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation. The primary outcome was early recurrence of AF within 3 months' post-ablation. Data preprocessing and feature selection were performed, followed by the development and evaluation of various machine learning models. The CatBoost model was selected as the best-performing model.
resultsThe study population had a mean age of 57.30 ± 14.05 years, and 61.4% were male. AF recurrence occurred in 26.1% of patients. The CatBoost model, utilizing 35 features, achieved an accuracy of 92.5% in predicting AF recurrence. The model demonstrated high sensitivity (88.6%) and specificity (94.0%), with an area under the ROC curve of 0.96. Paroxysmal AF, BUN, Cr, age, mitral regurgitation, LA velocity, and mild valvular heart disease were among the most important predictive features.
conclusionMachine learning methods, particularly the CatBoost model, demonstrate high accuracy in predicting early catheter ablation outcomes in AF patients. The developed model has the potential to improve patient care and decision-making by identifying patients most likely to benefit from the procedure. Further studies with larger sample sizes and external validation are warranted to assess the generalizability of this method for catheter ablation outcome prediction in AF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.