ArticleProteome science2024
Metabolism-related proteins as biomarkers for predicting prognosis in polycystic ovary syndrome.
Article in Proteome science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular Impact of Metabolic and Endocrine Disturbance on Endometrial Function in Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe study aimed to explore the role of metabolism-related proteins and their correlation with clinical data in predicting the prognosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
methodsThis research involves a secondary analysis of proteomic data derived from endometrial samples collected from our study group, which includes 33 PCOS patients and 7 control subjects. A comprehensive identification and analysis of 4425 proteins were conducted to screened differentially expressed proteins (DEPs). Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analyses were subsequently performed on the DEPs. To identify independent prognostic metabolism-related proteins, univariate Cox regression and LASSO regression were applied. The expression levels of these proteins were then used to develop a prognostic model, with their predictive accuracy evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves. Furthermore, we also investigate the correlation between clinical data and prognostic proteins.
resultsThe study identified 285 DEPs between the PCOS and control groups. GO enrichment analysis revealed significant involvement in metabolic processes, while KEGG pathway analysis highlighted pathways such as glycolysis/gluconeogenesis and glucagon signaling. Ten key metabolism-related proteins (ACSL5, ANPEP, CYB5R3, ENOPH1, GLS, GLUD1, LDHB, PLCD1, PYCR2, and PYCR3) were identified as significant predictors of PCOS prognosis. Patients were separated into high and low-risk groups according to the risk score. The ROC curves for predicting outcomes at 6, 28, and 37 weeks demonstrated excellent predictive performance, with AUC values of 0.98, 1.0, and 1.0, respectively. The nomogram constructed from these proteins provided a reliable tool for predicting pregnancy outcomes. DCA indicated a net benefit of the model across various risk thresholds, and the calibration curve confirmed the model's accuracy. Additionally, we also found BMI exhibited a significant negative correlation with the expression of GLS (r =-0.44, p = 0.01) and CHO showed a significant positive correlation with the expression of LDHB (r = 0.35, p = 0.04).
conclusionThe identified metabolism-related proteins provide valuable insights into the prognosis of PCOS. The protein based prognostic model offers a robust and reliable tool for risk stratification and personalized management of PCOS patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.