ArticleVirology journal2024
Development and validation of a predictive model for metabolic syndrome in a large cohort of people living with HIV.
Article in Virology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A body roundness index (BRI)-based predictive model for metabolic syndrome in perimenopausal and postmenopausal women-from a cross-sectional machine learning study to a longitudinal dynamic assessment.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- LDH to lymphocyte percentage ratio is a novel predictor of in-hospital mortality in PLWH - a retrospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Observational
- Understanding residual risk of cardiovascular disease in people with HIV.Current opinion in HIV and AIDS · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe global prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) in people living with HIV (PLWH) is on the rise in the post era of antiretroviral therapy (ART). Nevertheless, there are no validated predictive models available for assessing the risk of MetS in this specific population.
methodsThis study included PLWH who participated in annual follow-ups at Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital from September 2022 to November 2023. Participants enrolled in this study were divided into the training set and validation set based on the follow-up duration. We employed both multivariate logistic regression and lasso regression to develop three distinct prediction models. Subsequently, the optimal model was determined through comprehensive analyses, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Ultimately, we generated a nomogram for the optimal model and analyzed the correlation between the model score and the components of MetS.
resultsA total of 1017 participants were included in this study, with 814 in the training set and 203 in the validation set. The ultimate prediction model of MetS risk in PLWH incorporated five factors: age, CD8 + T cell counts, controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), gamma-glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the model in the training set and validation set was 0.849 and 0.834, respectively. Furthermore, we revealed a significant correlation between the model score and the MetS components. Additionally, the model score revealed significant group differences in MetS and related metabolic disorders.
conclusionsThis study established a potential model for predicting MetS in PLWH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.