ArticleBMC public health2024
Digital symptom management interventions for people with chronic kidney disease: a scoping review based on the UK Medical Research Council Framework.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- When Tech Meets Touch: Multistakeholder Perspectives and Implementation Strategies for eHealth in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review Using Computational Linguistics.Journal of nursing management · 2026Pooled it
- Randomized clinical trial of the KH4L self-management program.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- Symptom burden, comfort, and self-care agency in diabetic hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional study with mediation analysis.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Hygiene behaviours and protective attitudes in haemodialysis patients during COVID-19: impact on quality of life.BMC nephrology · 2026Article
- Enhancing Patient-Centered Communication in Hemodialysis Symptom Management Care-Development and Validation of the HSB-HD Scale for Assessing Help-Seeking Behavior in Hemodialysis Patients: A Multiphase Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of nursing management · 2026Article
- A multidimensional model of ethical challenges in hemodialysis: a qualitative study for specialist physicians.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Article
- Optimizing Nursing Communication for Symptom Management in Hemodialysis: Development of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Web Predictive Model for Burden Classification and Evidence Navigation.Journal of nursing management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is a growing global health issue with a complex symptom phenotype. It negatively impacts patients' health-related quality of life and increases healthcare utilization. While digital health interventions offer promising avenues for improving symptom management in CKD, understanding their development, validation, and effectiveness is crucial for clinical application.
objectiveTo comprehensively map the existing literature on digital health interventions designed to manage symptoms in patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD), using the UK Medical Research Council's complex intervention framework as a guiding lens. This scoping review aims to: (1) catalogue digital health interventions utilized in CKD symptom management; (2) detail the range of outcome measures assessing intervention effectiveness, including clinical efficacy, patient adherence, and quality of life; (3) examine the methodologies and frameworks employed in the creation of these interventions; (4) assess the pilot testing and effectiveness evaluations; and (5) categorize and analyze the barriers to implementation.
methodsA scoping review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Databases searched included PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and others, covering literature up to December 2023. Studies were selected based on predefined eligibility criteria for digital health interventions for CKD symptom management.
resultsThe search yielded 31 studies, with a mix of development and validation studies, predominantly from developed countries. The review highlights the potential of digital interventions in enhancing symptom management, quality of life, and patient engagement in CKD care. However, gaps were identified as follows: (1) Iterative refinement cycles involving multidisciplinary stakeholders enhanced intervention acceptability and usability should be guaranteed, (2) Theory-driven and evidence-based approaches were underutilized in current intervention development, (3) Long-term implementation outcomes and process evaluations were rarely assessed. This review maps an evolving landscape where digital health interventions offer patient-centric solutions for CKD symptom management while highlighting opportunities for methodological advancements.
conclusionDigital health interventions hold promise for improving symptom management in CKD, yet more research is needed to overcome current limitations and fully realize their potential. Future studies should focus on patient-centred designs, comprehensive validation processes, exploring the underlying mechanism using process evaluation and the integration of these technologies into routine clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.