Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702291›Full record

Observational studyCardiovascular diabetology2024

Hemoglobin A1c and abdominal obesity as predictors of diabetes and ASCVD in individuals with prediabetes in UK Biobank: a prospective observational study.

Karol M Pencina, George Thanassoulis, Michael J Pencina, Peter P Toth, Allan D Sniderman

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Cardiovascular diabetology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karol M PencinaDepartment of Medicine, Mike and Valeria Rosenbloom Centre for Cardiovascular Prevention, McGill University Health Centre-Royal Victoria Hospital, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, Québec, H4A 3J1, Canada.
George ThanassoulisDepartment of Medicine, Mike and Valeria Rosenbloom Centre for Cardiovascular Prevention, McGill University Health Centre-Royal Victoria Hospital, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, Québec, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Michael J PencinaDepartment of Medicine, Mike and Valeria Rosenbloom Centre for Cardiovascular Prevention, McGill University Health Centre-Royal Victoria Hospital, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, Québec, H4A 3J1, Canada.
Peter P TothCGH Medical Center, Sterling, IL, USA.
Allan D SnidermanDepartment of Medicine, Mike and Valeria Rosenbloom Centre for Cardiovascular Prevention, McGill University Health Centre-Royal Victoria Hospital, 1001 Boulevard Décarie, Montréal, Québec, H4A 3J1, Canada. allansniderman@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWhether "prediabetes" merits particular clinical attention beyond the management of associated risk factors is controversial, particularly given the expansion of the definition of prediabetes from HbA1c 6.0-6.4% to 5.7-6.4%. Accordingly, we compared the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and type II diabetes mellitus (DM) risk in male and female participants with prediabetes and HbA1c 5.7-6.0% (low) versus 6.1-6.4% (high) to examine whether preventive recommendations should prioritize treating blood sugar or obesity, the major determinants of risk of DM versus other causes of ASCVD, such as lipids and blood pressure. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methods10-year risks of ASCVD and DM risk were determined separately in 296,470 women and men, age 40-73, from UK Biobank, free of ASCVD and DM at baseline. Cox proportional hazards regression with adjustment for conventional risk factors and Kaplan-Meier estimators were used with low (HbA1c 5.7-6.0%) and high prediabetes (HbA1c 6.1-6.4%) as primary exposuress with further stratification and adjustment for waist circumference.

resultsIn multivariate-adjusted models, low and high prediabetes was associated with increased risk of ASCVD versus normal HbA1c in both women (HR = 1.08, 95% CI 1.01,1.15 in low prediabetes and 1.25, 95% CI 1.14,1.38 in high prediabetes) and men (HR = 1.18, 95%CI 1.11,1.24 in low prediabetes and 1.27, 95% CI 1.17,1.38 in high prediabetes). The associations with new onset DM were substantially more potent, achieving HR of 4.05, 95%CI 3.73,4.40 in low prediabetic women versus 14.22, 95% CI 13.06,15.49 in high pre-diabetic women and 4.45, 95% CI 4.12,4.80 in low prediabetic men versus 15.59, 95% CI 14.43,16.85 in high pre-diabetic men. Furthermore, increasing waist circumference in low prediabetic men and all prediabetic women was associated with meaningful increase in DM risk.

conclusionsThe risks of progression to both new onset DM and ASCVD are significantly greater in the prediabetic population. This underscores the importance of preventing the development of DM and efforts to reduce cardiometabolic risk through optimizing multiple risk factors in both categories of prediabetes. Risk modification by waist circumference suggests weight and glucose lowering therapies should be targeted at those with highest risks.

Indexed as

BiomarkersDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Glycated HemoglobinObesity, AbdominalPrediabetic StateAdultAgedAtherosclerosisBiological Specimen BanksBlood GlucoseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesBiomarkersBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanCardiovascular riskDiabetes mellitusHbA1cObesityPrediabetesWaist circumference

Identifiers

PMID39702291
PMCPMC11660550

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.