Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702733›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2025

Experimental Measurement and Mathematical Quantification of Fixed-Charged Density in Rat and Pig Brain Tissue.

Delin Zeng, Andrew V Basilio, Leanne A Pichay, Gerard A Ateshian, Olivia S Hansen, Alexander Romanov, Barclay Morrison

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Conductive Hydrogels for Exogenous Sensing and Cell Fate Control.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  2. Preclinical Models of Traumatic Brain Injury: Advances in In Vitro Models.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Delin Zeng *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, 351 Engineering Terrace MC 8904, 1210 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Andrew V Basilio *Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, 351 Engineering Terrace MC 8904, 1210 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Leanne A PichayDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, 351 Engineering Terrace MC 8904, 1210 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Gerard A AteshianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, 351 Engineering Terrace MC 8904, 1210 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Olivia S HansenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, 351 Engineering Terrace MC 8904, 1210 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, 10027, USA.
Alexander RomanovInstitute of Comparative Medicine, Columbia University, 650 West 168th Street, BB 1912B, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Barclay MorrisonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, 351 Engineering Terrace MC 8904, 1210 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY, 10027, USA. bm2119@columbia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7676-0864

Funding

Honda Motor Co., Ltd G22L03JL
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral edema is associated with poor prognosis because brain swelling within the rigid skull raises intracranial pressure, exacerbating secondary injuries following traumatic brain injury. Brain swelling can be characterized by triphasic biomechanics, which models brain tissue as a mixture of a deformable porous solid matrix with a negative fixed-charged density (FCD), water, and monovalent counterions. When brain cells die, the intracellular FCD is exposed, attracting cations into the cells. The increase in intracellular solute concentration generates osmotic pressure via the Gibbs-Donnan effect, driving water into cells and causing swelling. This study quantifies the FCD of rat and pig brain tissue by measuring the pressure generated by tissue within a confined volume as cells died. Rat brain tissue generated an averaged swelling pressure of 52.92 ± 20.40 mmHg (mean ± one standard deviation). Variations were observed between pig cortical white matter (7.14 ± 4.79 mmHg) and cortical gray matter (33.86 ± 11.89 mmHg). The corresponding FCD values were 42.54 ± 8.14 mEq/L for rat brain tissue, and 15.18 ± 5.38 mEq/L and 34.22 ± 6.31 mEq/L for pig cortical white and gray matter, respectively. Treating the rat brain tissue with DNAse, heparinase I, heparinase III, and chondroitinase ABC to degrade FCD significantly reduced swelling pressure. Good agreement between the experimental and numerically simulated responses supported the role of the FCD in cerebral edema formation. The reported FCD values can improve the biofidelity of computational models to predict post-traumatic cerebral edema, aiding the improvement of safety systems.

Indexed as

BrainBrain EdemaModels, BiologicalAnimalsMaleOsmotic PressureRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySwineWhite MatterCerebral edemaFinite element modelingIntracellular fixed-charged densityTraumatic brain injuryTriphasic swelling biomechanics

Identifiers

PMID39702733

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.