Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39702981›Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2025

An update of a systematic review and meta-analyses exploring flavours in intervention studies of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation.

Nicola Lindson, Jonathan Livingstone-Banks, Ailsa R Butler, David T Levy, Phoebe Barnett, Annika Theodoulou, Caitlin Notley, Nancy A Rigotti, Yixian Chen, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Patterns of e-Cigarette Use and Smoking Cessation Outcomes: Secondary Analysis of a Large Randomised Controlled Trial to Inform Clinical Advice.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Toxicity and Appeal of Flavoured E-Cigarettes and Flavour Ban Outcomes: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nicola LindsonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2539-9268
Jonathan Livingstone-BanksNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3757-5591
Ailsa R ButlerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8577-6574
David T LevyCancer Prevention and Control Program, Georgetown University-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5280-3612
Phoebe BarnettCentre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Research department of Clinical, Educational and Health psychology, University College London, UK.
Annika TheodoulouNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8942-2167
Caitlin NotleyAddiction Research Group, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0876-3304
Nancy A RigottiTobacco Research and Treatment Center, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Yixian ChenDepartment of Integrative Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jamie Hartmann-BoyceNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Research Project 3: Modeling the Impact of Tobacco Control Policies on Polytobacco Use and Associated Health DisparitiesU54CA229974 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Ritesh I Mistry · 2018 to 2026
$39.2M
National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and FDA Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) 2U54CA229974NCI NIH HHS U54 CA229974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo determine patterns of e-cigarette flavour use (sweet, tobacco, menthol/mint) in interventional studies of e-cigarettes for stopping smoking, and to estimate associations between flavours and smoking/vaping outcomes.

methodsUpdate of secondary data analyses, including meta-analyses subgrouped by flavour provision and narrative syntheses, incorporating data from January 2004 to February 2024. Eligible studies were identified from a Cochrane review. Studies provided adults who smoked cigarettes with nicotine-containing e-cigarettes for smoking cessation and provided data on e-cigarette e-liquid flavour use. Outcomes included participants' flavour use measured at any time, plus smoking abstinence, abstinence from all tobacco or commercial nicotine products and allocated product use at 6 months or longer, reported as risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 1 tool.

resultsWe included 25 studies (n = 16 748); 21 contributed to subgroup meta-analyses and 18 provided flavour choices. We judged 15 studies at high, seven at low and three at unclear risk of bias. In studies where participants had a choice of flavours, some switching between flavours occurred (five studies). A preference for sweet (including fruit) flavours over tobacco and menthol was indicated (in 6 of 11 studies); however, there were differences across studies. Subgroup meta-analyses showed no clear associations between e-liquid flavours provided and smoking cessation or study product use. One included study randomised participants to two different flavour conditions and found similar cessation rates and long-term e-cigarette use between arms at 12 months.

conclusionsSome people using e-cigarettes to quit smoking switch between e-cigarette flavours during a quit attempt. Sweet flavours may be preferred overall, but this may differ depending on context. Based on intervention studies, there is no clear association between the use of e-cigarette flavours and smoking cessation or longer-term e-cigarette use, possibly due to a paucity of data.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFlavoring AgentsSmoking CessationVapingHumansFlavoring Agentse‐cigarettesflavoursnicotinesmoking cessationsystematic reviewtobacco

Identifiers

PMID39702981
PMCPMC11907327

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.