ArticleCureus2024
Successful Rescue of Ventricular Fibrillation Electrical Storm Secondary to Acute Myocardial Infarction in a Patient Presenting to a District General Hospital: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ventricular arrhythmia is a critical and challenging cardiovascular complication of myocardial infarction (MI). An electrical storm (ES), characterised by three or more episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmia within 24 hours, poses a significant life-threatening risk. Standard management includes advanced life support (ALS) protocols and specialised pharmacological interventions. We present the case of a 43-year-old female who presented to the emergency department (ED) following an out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (OOHVF) arrest, with the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) achieved after multiple defibrillation shocks. Electrocardiography (ECG) revealed anterior ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) involving the left anterior descending (LAD) artery. During her ED stay, she experienced recurrent ventricular fibrillation (VF) arrests requiring repeated defibrillation, adrenaline, amiodarone, and thrombolysis with alteplase. She was subsequently intubated and transferred to a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) centre with intensive care support. Angiography confirmed a 100% occlusion of the LAD, which was successfully treated with stenting. The patient was admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and later discharged with full neurological recovery, on secondary prevention and heart failure therapy, with follow-up planned. This case underscores the complexity of managing electrical storms in MI, particularly in non-PPCI centres. It emphasises the importance of thrombolysis as an early reperfusion strategy in STEMI, especially when PPCI is not immediately available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.