Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703287›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Self-Reported Comfort and Use of Tobacco Cessation Interventions by Healthcare Providers.

Anjali Singh, Daniel J Berger, Sarahrose Jonik, Meghan E Robbins, Steven King, Jessica Yingst

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anjali SinghCollege of Medicine, Penn State University College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.
Daniel J BergerDepartments of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, USA.
Sarahrose JonikCollege of Medicine, Penn State University College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.
Meghan E RobbinsDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, USA.
Steven KingDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health, Ann Arbor, USA.
Jessica YingstDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Penn State University College of Medicine, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background The effects of tobacco use create a significant burden on the American healthcare system. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends a tobacco cessation framework consisting of asking all patients about any tobacco use, advising they quit, assessing their willingness to start a quit attempt, assisting in any attempts, and arranging follow-up. This is known as the "5A's" and is considered a standard of care for tobacco cessation. Physician-provided cessation interventions have been shown to be effective in helping patients stop their tobacco use; however, studies have shown that physicians and other healthcare providers do not consistently offer tobacco cessation interventions. This study aimed to evaluate healthcare providers' comfort with and self-reported use of tobacco cessation interventions.  Methods An online survey was made available to all Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center physicians, physician assistants (PAs), nurse practitioners (NPs), registered nurses (RNs), and respiratory therapists (RTs). The survey assessed respondents' use of the USPSTF "5A's" cessation framework, comfort in counseling patients, use of cessation interventions, and desire for further education. Descriptive statistics were generated, and chi-square tests were used to compare differences in responses across provider groups. Results A total of 430 healthcare professionals (mean age of 40.1 years, 76.1% female) responded to the survey, including 55 (12.1%) physicians, 76 (17.7%) resident/fellows, 44 (10.2%) PAs, 57 (13.5%) NPs, 146 (33.9%) RNs, and 54 (12.5%) RTs. The majority (n = 407, 95.5%) of respondents reported a belief that it is "extremely" or "very" important for their patients to stop smoking cigarettes. Although more than 160 (70%) providers reported feeling "very comfortable" or "somewhat comfortable" counseling patients who were "ready to quit" smoking, only half reported the same for patients who were "not ready to quit." There was significant variation in the use of the recommended "5A's," with NPs and attending physicians reporting the most regular use. Self-reported use of the "Ask" and "Advise" components of the "5A's" was higher than the "Assess", "Assist", and "Arrange" components, with low rates of use of pharmacologic cessation methods. Only 13 (3.2%) providers reported regularly billing for cessation counseling.  Conclusions While healthcare professionals recognize the importance of tobacco cessation for their patients, gaps persist in the consistent application of the "5A's" model and provider comfort in counseling patients to quit, particularly those perceived as "not ready to quit." This discomfort with counseling, along with hesitancy to offer cessation interventions, results in missed opportunities to help patients with tobacco use disorder. Differences in cessation practices across healthcare roles suggest opportunities for targeted improvement. Enhancing both provider training and health system interventions is essential for expanding patient access to effective cessation interventions.

Indexed as

nicotine replacementsmokingsmoking cessationtobaccotobacco cessation

Identifiers

PMID39703287
PMCPMC11658895

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.