Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703436›Full record

ArticleVeterinary record open2024

An investigation of the owner- and pet-related factors that may affect the use of alternative feeding practices in dogs and cats in Hungary.

Blanka Vékony, Zsanett Bodor, Dániel Sándor Veres, Péter Vajdovich, Erzsébet Mák

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary record open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Blanka VékonyDepartment of Dietetics and Nutritional Sciences Semmelweis University Faculty of Health Sciences Budapest Hungary.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8508-8053
Zsanett BodorDepartment of Dietetics and Nutritional Sciences Semmelweis University Faculty of Health Sciences Budapest Hungary.
Dániel Sándor VeresDepartment of Biophysics and Radiation Biology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary.
Péter VajdovichDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Oncology University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest Hungary.
Erzsébet MákDepartment of Dietetics and Nutritional Sciences Semmelweis University Faculty of Health Sciences Budapest Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Alternative feeding practices have become increasingly popular among companion animal owners. We sought to identify possible factors behind the choice of alternative feeding types. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed with Hungarian pet owners. Descriptive data analysis and logistic regression models were undertaken to determine factors that may increase the likelihood of adopting alternative feeding practices. Results: In total, 1007 pet owners completed the questionnaire, of which 789 were dog owners and 218 were cat owners. The type of settlement was identified as a possible factor influencing the choice of application of alternative feeding patterns for dogs and cats. In the case of dogs, the owner's diet variable showed significantly increased odds of choosing an alternative feeding pattern where the owner followed an alternative diet. For cats, the owner's diet did not have a significant effect on choosing alternative feeding practices for these pets. Conclusions: Owners who followed an alternative diet were more likely to choose an alternative feeding pattern for their dogs but not for their cats. Further study is required to identify additional factors that may influence the owners' choice of feeding practices and to more widely investigate the feeding habits of cat owners.

Identifiers

PMID39703436
PMCPMC11656396

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.