Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39703845›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024

Monitoring central nervous system tumour metabolism using cerebrospinal fluid.

Alison Whitby, Madhumita Dandapani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alison WhitbyChildren's Brain Tumour Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Madhumita DandapaniChildren's Brain Tumour Research Centre, Biodiscovery Institute, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Central nervous system (CNS) tumours are the most common cancer cause of death in under 40s in the UK, largely because they persist and recur and sometimes metastasise during treatment. Therefore, longitudinal monitoring of patients during and following treatment must be undertaken to understand the course of the disease and alter treatment plans reactively. This monitoring must be specific, sensitive, rapid, low cost, simple, and accepted by the patient. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) examination obtained following lumbar puncture, already a routine part of treatment in paediatric cases, could be better utilised with improved biomarkers. In this review, we discuss the potential for metabolites in the CSF to be used as biomarkers of CNS tumour remission, progression, response to drugs, recurrence and metastasis. We confer the clinical benefits and risks of this approach and conclude that there are many potential advantages over other tests and the required instrumentation is already present in UK hospitals. On the other hand, the approach needs more research investment to find more metabolite biomarkers, better understand their relation to the tumour, and validate those biomarkers in a standardised assay in order for the assay to become a clinical reality.

Indexed as

biomarkersbrain cancercerebrospinal fluidmetabolomicsmonitoringrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39703845
PMCPMC11655469

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.