Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39704607›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2025

Machine learning based radiomics model to predict radiotherapy induced cardiotoxicity in breast cancer.

Amin Talebi, Ahmad Bitarafan-Rajabi, Azin Alizadeh-Asl, Parisa Seilani, Benyamin Khajetash, Ghasem Hajianfar, Meysam Tavakoli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cardiac substructure dosimetry in thoracic radiotherapy: moving beyond mean heart dose and toward precision cardiac risk mitigation.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amin TalebiDepartment of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad Bitarafan-RajabiCardiovascular Intervention Research Center, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Azin Alizadeh-AslRajaei Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Cardio-Oncology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Parisa SeilaniRajaei Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center, Cardio-Oncology Research Center, Iran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Benyamin KhajetashDepartment of Medical physics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ghasem HajianfarDivision of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
Meysam TavakoliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7475-2139

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCardiotoxicity is one of the major concerns in breast cancer treatment, significantly affecting patient outcomes. To improve the likelihood of favorable outcomes for breast cancer survivors, it is essential to carefully balance the potential advantages of treatment methods with the risks of harm to healthy tissues, including the heart. There is currently a lack of comprehensive, data-driven evidence on effective risk stratification strategies. The aim of this study is to investigate the prediction of cardiotoxicity using machine learning methods combined with radiomics, clinical, and dosimetric features. MATERIALS AND

methodsA cohort of 83 left-sided breast cancer patients without a history of cardiac disease was examined. Two- and three-dimensional echocardiography were performed before and after 6 months of treatment to evaluate cardiotoxicity. Cardiac dose-volume histograms, demographic data, echocardiographic parameters, and ultrasound imaging radiomics features were collected for all patients. Toxicity modeling was developed with three feature selection methods and five classifiers in four separate groups (Dosimetric, Dosimetric + Demographic, Dosimetric + Demographic + Clinical, and Dosimetric + Demographic + Clinical + Imaging). The prediction performance of the models was validated using five-fold cross-validation and evaluated by AUCs.

results58% of patients showed cardiotoxicity 6 months after treatment. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction and Global longitudinal strain decreased significantly compared to pre-treatment (p-value < 0.001). After feature selection and prediction modeling, the Dosimetric, Dosimetric + Demographic, Dosimetric + Demographic + Clinical, Dosimetric + Demographic + Clinical + Imaging models showed prediction performance (AUC) up to 73%, 75%, 85%, and 97%, respectively.

conclusionIncorporating clinical and imaging features along with dose descriptors are beneficial for predicting cardiotoxicity after radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCardiotoxicityMachine LearningRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedUnilateral Breast NeoplasmsAdultAgedEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOrgans at RiskRadiomicsRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-Modulatedcardiotoxicityechocardiographymachine learningpredictionradiomicsradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39704607
PMCPMC11969081

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.