SynthesisCancer metastasis reviews2024
Influence of antibody-drug conjugate cleavability, drug-to-antibody ratio, and free payload concentration on systemic toxicities: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Cancer metastasis reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative safety profiles of antibody-drug conjugates: a real-world analysis of monotherapy and combination regimens in solid tumors.Drug delivery · 2026Article
- Antibody-drug conjugates in breast cancer: redefining targeted therapy.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Toxicity of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer: Current Evidence and Evolving Considerations: JACC: CardioOncology Primer.JACC. CardioOncology · 2026Review
- Investigation of Payloads and Related Impurities in the cysteine-linked Antibody-Drug Conjugate Using Mass Spectrometry Techniques.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Infectious Complications of Antibody-Drug Conjugates: A Review of Safety Data from FDA-Approved Agents.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer therapy: do we need biomarkers? A comprehensive review.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
- Antibody-drug conjugates in cancer treatment: from molecular design to clinical implementation.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Review
- Exposure-Response Relationships of Antibody Drug Conjugates in Solid Tumours.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2026Review
- Formulation Matters: The Overlooked Engine of Stability and Success in Antibody-Drug Conjugates.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Clinical applications of antibody-drug conjugates in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Antibody-drug conjugates in colorectal cancer: advances in targeted delivery and personalized oncology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- The role of antibody-drug conjugates in the treatment of lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- A real-world study of adverse event profiles associated with the four key components of antibody-drug conjugates based on the FAERS database.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Targeted drug conjugates and molecular mechanisms in overcoming lung cancer drug resistance.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- Antibody-drug conjugate: a newly developed biological missile for tumor treatment.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While in theory antibody drug conjugates (ADCs) deliver high-dose chemotherapy directly to target cells, numerous side effects are observed in clinical practice. We sought to determine the effect of linker design (cleavable versus non-cleavable), drug-to-antibody ratio (DAR), and free payload concentration on systemic toxicity. Two systematic reviews were performed via PubMed search of clinical trials published between January 1998-July 2022. Eligible studies: (1) clinical trial for cancer therapy in adults, (2) ≥ 1 study arm included a single-agent ADC, (3) ADC used was commercially available/FDA-approved. Data was extracted and pooled using generalized linear mixed effects logistic models. 40 clinical trials involving 7,879 patients from 11 ADCs, including 9 ADCs with cleavable linkers (N = 2,985) and 2 with non-cleavable linkers (N = 4,894), were included. Significantly more composite adverse events (AEs) ≥ grade 3 occurred in patients in the cleavable linkers arm (47%) compared with the non-cleavable arm (34%). When adjusted for DAR, for grade ≥ 3 toxicities, non-cleavable linkers remained independently associated with lower toxicity for any AE (p = 0.002). Higher DAR was significantly associated with higher probability of grade ≥ 3 toxicity for any AE. There was also a significant interaction between cleavability status and DAR for any AE (p = 0.002). Finally, higher measured systemic free payload concentrations were significantly associated with higher DARs (p = 0.043). Our results support the hypothesis that ADCs with cleavable linkers result in premature payload release, leading to increased systemic free payload concentrations and associated toxicities. This may help to inform future ADC design and rational clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.