ReviewAmerican journal of physiology. Renal physiology2025
Guidelines for sex-specific considerations to improve rigor in renal research and how we got there.
Review in American journal of physiology. Renal physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic estrogen supplementation in the aging castrated male rat is not associated with renal injury or activation of the renin angiotensin system.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2026Article
- Review
- Contribution of murine strain background to NabioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Influence of Field Strength, Sex, and Age on Pseudo-Continuous Arterial Spin Labeling and TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological sex significantly influences disease presentation, progression, and therapeutic outcomes in chronic kidney disease and acute kidney injury. Sex hormones, including estrogen and testosterone, modulate key renal functions, including renal blood flow, glomerular filtration, and electrolyte transport, thereby affecting disease trajectory in a sex-specific manner. It is critical for researchers to understand why and how to integrate sex as a biological variable in data collection, analysis, and reporting. Integrating a sex-based perspective in kidney research will lead to more personalized and efficacious treatment strategies, optimizing therapeutic interventions for each sex. If addressed properly, the incorporation of sex as a biological variable (SABV) in renal research not only enhances the mechanistic understanding of renal disease, but also paves the way for precision medicine, promising improved clinical outcomes, and tailored treatment protocols for all patients. This paper is designed to serve as a guideline for researchers interested in rigorously incorporating sex as a biological variable in their studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.