Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39707112›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025

Uncertainty Quantification in Automated Detection of Vertebral Metastasis Using Ensemble Monte Carlo Dropout.

Soo Ho Ahn, Seungjin Baek, Jiwoo Park, Jaewon Kim, Hyungjin Rhee, Yong Eun Chung, Hwiyoung Kim, Young Han Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Soo Ho AhnDepartment of Integrative Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seungjin BaekDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Jiwoo ParkDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Jaewon KimDepart of Medicine, College of Medicine, Catholic Kwandong University, Gangneung-Si, Gangwon, Korea.
Hyungjin RheeDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Yong Eun ChungDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea.
Hwiyoung KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea. hykim82@yuhs.ac.
Young Han LeeDepartment of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiological Science and Center for Clinical Imaging Data Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-Gu, Seoul, 03722, Korea. sando@yuhs.ac.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5602-391X

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2022R1F1A1071702
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accurate and early detection of vertebral metastases is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Although deep-learning models have shown potential in this area, their lack of prediction reliability and robustness limits their clinical utility. To address these challenges, we propose a novel technique called Ensemble Monte Carlo Dropout (EMCD) for uncertainty quantification (UQ), which combines the Monte Carlo dropout and deep ensembles. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 11,468 abdominal computed tomography images from 116 patients diagnosed with vertebral metastases and 957 images from 11 healthy controls. Uncertainty was quantified and visualized using single number, predictive probability interval, posterior distribution and uncertainty class activation maps to provide a detailed understanding of prediction confidence. The EMCD model demonstrated superior performance compared with traditional UQ methods, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.93 and an expected calibration error of 0.09, indicating high predictive accuracy and reliability. In addition, the model exhibited strong performance in handling out-of-distribution data. When data retention was applied based on uncertainty values, the AUC of the model improved to 0.96, highlighting the potential of uncertainty-driven data selection to enhance performance. The EMCD model represents a significant advancement in the automated detection of vertebral metastases, providing superior diagnostic accuracy and introducing a robust UQ framework to aid clinicians in making informed decisions.

Indexed as

Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedSpinal NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedDeep LearningFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMonte Carlo MethodReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesUncertaintyComputed tomographyDeep learningMetastasisSpineUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID39707112
PMCPMC12572441

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.