ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Uncertainty Quantification in Automated Detection of Vertebral Metastasis Using Ensemble Monte Carlo Dropout.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Seeing the Risk in Virtual Fat-Suppressed Spine MRI: External Benchmarking and Uncertainty-Guided Selective Risk Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Uncertainty quantification for artificial intelligence in medical imaging: what every radiologist needs to know.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Article
- Uncertainty estimation and probabilistic skull shape reconstruction using bayesian neural networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Review
- Applications and Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Metastasis Imaging: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The accurate and early detection of vertebral metastases is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Although deep-learning models have shown potential in this area, their lack of prediction reliability and robustness limits their clinical utility. To address these challenges, we propose a novel technique called Ensemble Monte Carlo Dropout (EMCD) for uncertainty quantification (UQ), which combines the Monte Carlo dropout and deep ensembles. In this retrospective study, we analyzed 11,468 abdominal computed tomography images from 116 patients diagnosed with vertebral metastases and 957 images from 11 healthy controls. Uncertainty was quantified and visualized using single number, predictive probability interval, posterior distribution and uncertainty class activation maps to provide a detailed understanding of prediction confidence. The EMCD model demonstrated superior performance compared with traditional UQ methods, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.93 and an expected calibration error of 0.09, indicating high predictive accuracy and reliability. In addition, the model exhibited strong performance in handling out-of-distribution data. When data retention was applied based on uncertainty values, the AUC of the model improved to 0.96, highlighting the potential of uncertainty-driven data selection to enhance performance. The EMCD model represents a significant advancement in the automated detection of vertebral metastases, providing superior diagnostic accuracy and introducing a robust UQ framework to aid clinicians in making informed decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.