Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39707209›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2024

Influence of liberal versus conservative oxygen therapies on the hemodynamic parameters of mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis: a randomized clinical trial.

Huda F Ghazaly, Ahmed Alsaied A Aly, Ahmed S Tammam, Mahmoud M Hassan, Soudy S Hammad, Naggeh M Mahmoud, Tarek S Hemaida

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04824703 (Comparative Study Between Liberal and Conservative Oxygen Therapy in Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04824703 nacompletednot on this map

Comparative Study Between Liberal and Conservative Oxygen Therapy in Mechanically Ventilated Intensive Care Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorAswan University HospitalRan2021 to 2023Enrolled106ConditionsOxygen TherapyArmsOxygen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huda F GhazalyAnesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt. hfa737@gmail.com.
Ahmed Alsaied A AlyAnesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.
Ahmed S TammamAnesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.
Mahmoud M HassanAnesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.
Soudy S HammadAnesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.
Naggeh M MahmoudCardiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.
Tarek S HemaidaAnesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is no significant evidence verifying the efficacy of liberal versus conservative oxygen therapy on hemodynamics in patients with sepsis. We investigated how liberal and conservative oxygen therapy influenced stroke volume, cardiac output, and vasopressor needs in patients with sepsis undergoing mechanical ventilation.

methodsThis randomized clinical trial included 106 patients with an admission diagnosis of infection, a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of two points or higher and required invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 72 h. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two oxygenation strategies: liberal (n = 53) with a target SpO2 of ≥ 96% or conservative (n = 53) with a target SpO2 of 88-92%. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography was done twice to measure stroke volume and cardiac output, initially upon enrollment in the trial and then 72 h later. The primary outcome was stroke volume. Secondary outcomes were cardiac output, vasopressor use, mechanical ventilation duration, ICU stay length, and adverse events.

resultsStroke volume and cardiac output measurements did not differ significantly between research groups after 72 h of oxygenation treatment (p = 0.459 and 0.637, respectively). Forty-five patients (84.9%) in the conservative oxygen therapy group needed vasopressors to maintain their mean arterial pressure above 65 mmHg, whereas 35 patients (66.0%) in the liberal group did (p = 0.024). A multivariate logistic regression analysis of the independent variables for vasopressor requirements revealed that patients in the conservative oxygen group were 3.83 times more likely to require vasopressors (AOR = 3.83, 95% CI: 1.31-11.18, p = 0.014) than those in the liberal group. Older patients (AOR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07, p = 0.038) and those with higher SOFA scores (AOR = 1.36, CI: 1.09-1.68, P = 0.005) were significantly more likely to need vasopressors.

conclusionsLiberal or conservative oxygen therapy did not influence stroke volume or cardiac output measurements in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis. Patients in the conservative oxygen group were more likely to require vasopressors than those in the liberal group.

trial registrationThis study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Aswan University Hospital (approval number: Aswu/460/5/20) (registration date: 05/05/2020) and registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04824703) (03/30/2021).

Indexed as

Cardiac OutputHemodynamicsOxygen Inhalation TherapyRespiration, ArtificialSepsisVasoconstrictor AgentsAgedFemaleHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOrgan Dysfunction ScoresStroke VolumeVasoconstrictor AgentsCardiac outputOxygen therapyOxygen toxicitySepsisStroke volume

Identifiers

PMID39707209
PMCPMC11660434

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.