ArticleBMC medicine2024
A proposal to simplify the definition of pediatric hypertension: bridging the gap between perception and action.
Article in BMC medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe importance of routine hypertension screening in children and adolescents is now well recognized. However, it is often undiagnosed in clinical practice, partly due to the reliance on a complex blood pressure (BP) percentile-based table with hundreds of cutoffs by age, sex, and height. MAIN TEXT: Many studies have explored simplified tools for screening hypertension in children and adolescents, such as simplified formulas, simplified BP tables by age and sex group, by age group, or by height group, and the BP to height ratio. Nevertheless, validation studies have demonstrated that these simplified tools are prone to yielding many false-positive cases or remain inconvenient to use in primary pediatric care settings and large-scale screening surveys. To address this issue, we propose adopting static BP cutoffs of 120/80 mmHg for children aged 6-12 years and 130/80 mmHg for adolescents aged 13-17 years to simplify the definition of hypertension. Our proposed static BP cutoffs have shown comparable performance to the complex BP percentile-based table in predicting subclinical cardiovascular damage in both childhood and adulthood.
conclusionsWe recommend using static BP cutoffs (120/80 mmHg for children and 130/80 mmHg for adolescents) to facilitate the screening of pediatric hypertension in clinical practice, thereby bridging the gap between perception and action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.