ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Long term functional outcome for the cubital tunnel syndrome after endoscopic assisted release of the ulnar nerve.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe endoscopic assisted release for cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS) gained popularity in recent years with unclear long-term results. This study aims to evaluate long term results regarding functional and subjective outcomes after endoscopic assisted release for the CuTS. MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty one patients who have been treated by endoscopic assisted release for CuTS between 2006 and 2013 were followed up both clinically and with a questionnaire with a mean follow up of 152 months (range 120-204 months). Functional and subjective parameters were evaluated and statistically compared to the contralateral elbow. For statistical evaluation one-sample t-test and the McNemar test were defined as appropriate.
resultsPinch grip strength, two-point discrimination, application of Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments, Tinel's sign, grip and three-point pinch strength showed no significant difference. The DASH score was 14,2 with 96,6% of patients rating good/excellent results.
conclusionsThis study found the endoscopic assisted release of the ulnar nerve to be an efficacious and safe method for the treatment of CuTS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39708061What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.