Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39708177›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurology2024

Brain MRI volumetry and atrophy rating scales as predictors of amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a real-world memory clinic setting.

A Zilioli, A Rosenberg, R Mohanty, A Matton, T Granberg, G Hagman, J Lötjönen, M Kivipelto, E Westman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

A ZilioliDepartment of Neurology, University-Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy.
A RosenbergPopulation Health Unit, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
R MohantyDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
A MattonDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
T GranbergDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
G HagmanDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
J LötjönenCombinostics Oy, Tampere, Finland.
M Kivipelto *Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden.
E Westman *Division of Clinical Geriatrics, Center for Alzheimer Research, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden. Eric.westman@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3115-2977

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting amyloid status is crucial in light of upcoming disease-modifying therapies and the need to identify treatment-eligible patients with Alzheimer's disease. In our study, we aimed to predict CSF-amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a memory clinic by (I) comparing the performance of visual/automated rating scales and MRI volumetric analysis and (II) combining MRI volumetric data with neuropsychological tests and APOE4 status. Two hundred ninety patients underwent a comprehensive assessment. The cNeuro cMRI software (Combinostics Oy) provided automated computed rating scales and volumetric analysis. Amyloid status was determined using data-driven CSF biomarker cutoffs (Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio), and eligibility for anti-Aβ treatment was assessed according to recent recommendations published after the FDA approval of the anti-Aβ drug aducanumab. The automated rating scales and volumetric analysis demonstrated higher performance compared to visual assessment in predicting Aβ status, especially for parietal-GCA (AUC = 0.70), MTA (AUC = 0.66) scores, hippocampal (AUC = 0.68), and angular gyrus (AUC = 0.69) volumes, despite low global accuracy. When we combined hippocampal and angular gyrus volumes with RAVLT immediate recall and APOE4 status, we achieved the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.82), which remained high even in predicting anti-Aβ treatment eligibility (AUC = 0.81). Our study suggests that automated analysis of atrophy rating scales and brain volumetry outperforms operator-dependent visual rating scales. When combined with neuropsychological and genetic information, this computerized approach may play a crucial role not only in a research context but also in a real-world memory clinic. This integration results in a high level of accuracy for predicting amyloid-CSF status and anti-Aβ treatment eligibility.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAtrophyBrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedApolipoprotein E4BiomarkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsPeptide FragmentsaducanumabAmyloid beta-Peptidesamyloid beta-protein (1-42)Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedApolipoprotein E4BiomarkersPeptide FragmentsAnti-amyloid treatment eligibilityAtrophy rating scalesBrain volumetryNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID39708177
PMCPMC11663166

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.