ArticleJournal of neurology2024
Brain MRI volumetry and atrophy rating scales as predictors of amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a real-world memory clinic setting.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- MRI approach to the patient with suspected dementia: artificial intelligence techniques and semi-quantitative rating scales compared.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Radiological Reporting of Brain Atrophy in MRI: Real-Life Comparison Between Narrative Reports, Semiquantitative Scales and Automated Software-Based Volumetry.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical impact of amyloid PET in memory clinic: A 2-year longitudinal real-world study in Taiwan.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Predicting amyloid status is crucial in light of upcoming disease-modifying therapies and the need to identify treatment-eligible patients with Alzheimer's disease. In our study, we aimed to predict CSF-amyloid status and eligibility for anti-amyloid treatment in a memory clinic by (I) comparing the performance of visual/automated rating scales and MRI volumetric analysis and (II) combining MRI volumetric data with neuropsychological tests and APOE4 status. Two hundred ninety patients underwent a comprehensive assessment. The cNeuro cMRI software (Combinostics Oy) provided automated computed rating scales and volumetric analysis. Amyloid status was determined using data-driven CSF biomarker cutoffs (Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio), and eligibility for anti-Aβ treatment was assessed according to recent recommendations published after the FDA approval of the anti-Aβ drug aducanumab. The automated rating scales and volumetric analysis demonstrated higher performance compared to visual assessment in predicting Aβ status, especially for parietal-GCA (AUC = 0.70), MTA (AUC = 0.66) scores, hippocampal (AUC = 0.68), and angular gyrus (AUC = 0.69) volumes, despite low global accuracy. When we combined hippocampal and angular gyrus volumes with RAVLT immediate recall and APOE4 status, we achieved the highest accuracy (AUC = 0.82), which remained high even in predicting anti-Aβ treatment eligibility (AUC = 0.81). Our study suggests that automated analysis of atrophy rating scales and brain volumetry outperforms operator-dependent visual rating scales. When combined with neuropsychological and genetic information, this computerized approach may play a crucial role not only in a research context but also in a real-world memory clinic. This integration results in a high level of accuracy for predicting amyloid-CSF status and anti-Aβ treatment eligibility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.