ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024
Short-term follow-up of single-port thoracoscopic rib fracture reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of multiple rib fractures.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thoracoscopic internal fixation, open surgical internal fixation, and conservative treatment of rib fractures: differences in postoperative rehabilitation and chest volume (a randomized controlled trial).European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Trial
- Minimally invasive versus open fixation for flail chest in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study on perioperative safety and long-term outcomes.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Initial experience of intrathoracic rib fixation using RibFix Advantage™ at a major trauma centre: operative technique and case series.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Comparative study of total thoracoscopic and traditional incision internal fixation for the treatment of multiple rib fractures.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of single-port thoracoscopic rib fracture reduction and internal fixation for the treatment of multiple rib fractures.
methodsThis study included 149 patients with multiple rib fractures admitted to the Second People's Hospital Affiliated with Fujian University of Chinese Medicine between June 2021 and April 2024. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical method. The study group, consisting of 84 cases, underwent rib fracture reduction using a single-port thoracoscopy and internal fixation with a memory alloy reverse rib embrace device. The control group, consisting of 65 cases, underwent traditional open surgery for rib fracture internal fixation. Perioperative and follow-up data were collected and analyzed to assess incision length, total operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of memory alloy embrasures placed, placement success rate, drainage tube placement time, time to mobilization, total hospitalization duration, total cost, preoperative and postoperative pain levels, postoperative complications, and rib CT results three months postoperatively.
resultsThere was no statistically significant difference in general conditions between the study group and the control group. All 149 patients successfully completed the surgery, with 3 to 10 intrathoracic memory alloy embrace devices placed in each patient, achieving a 100% success rate. Compared to the control group, the study group showed significant improvements in incision length (3.5 ± 0.6 vs. 6.5±1.6 cm), intraoperative blood loss (92.5 ± 15.1 vs. 113 ± 18.2 ml), drainage tube placement time (75.4 ± 13.1 vs. 90.6 ± 15.4 h), mobilization time (2.9 ± 1.1 vs. 3.3 ± 1.3 days), and hospital stay (10.8 ± 2.7 vs. 12 ± 3.5 days), with differences being statistically significant (P < 0.05). In terms of preoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores, the study group had a significantly lower score on the first postoperative day compared to the control group (3.9 ± 1.1 vs. 4.5 ± 1.4, P < 0.05). A follow-up CT and 3D reconstruction at 3 months post-surgery showed that all patients had securely fixed plates, with the study group demonstrating a higher rate of excellent fracture healing (94% vs. 83.1%), which was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
conclusionThe use of a memory alloy reverse rib embrasure device for intrathoracic rib fracture fixation via single-port thoracoscopic surgery is safe and reliable. This method demonstrates a high success rate of internal fixation, excellent clinical fracture healing, and advantages such as minimal trauma, rapid recovery, and the simultaneous treatment of other intrathoracic conditions. It significantly reduces postoperative pain and enhances the quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.