ArticleBMC surgery2024
Influence of an enhanced recovery programme on clinical outcomes and health-related quality of life after pancreaticoduodenectomy ad modum Whipple - an explorative and comparative single-centre study.
Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe introduction of enhanced recovery programmes (ERP) in pancreatic surgery has significantly improved clinical outcomes by decreasing the length of hospital stay, cost and complications without increasing readmissions and reoperations. To complement evidence on these outcomes, there is a need to explore patients' perspectives of a structured ERP. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients before and after implementing ERP in pancreaticoduodenectomy ad modum Whipple (PD) at a regional surgical centre.
methodThis was an explorative and comparative single-centre study in Sweden. A prospective cohort receiving ERP was included between October 2019 and December 2022 (n = 73) and was compared with a retrospective pre-ERP cohort between October 2011 and December 2013 (n = 65). EQ-5D, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORCT) Quality of Life Questionnaire Cancer 30 items (QOL-C30), and EORCT Quality of Life Questionnaire pancreatic cancer module (QOL-PAN26) were collected preoperatively and at three and six months postoperatively. Demographic and clinical variables were collected from patient charts. Complications were expressed using the Clavien-Dindo Classification and the Comprehensive Complications Index (CCI).
resultsThere were no significant differences in general health, cancer- or disease-specific HRQoL between the pre-ERP and ERP cohorts. Length of stay was significantly shorter in the ERP cohort (16 vs. 11 days; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in CCI.
conclusionNo significant differences were found in the HRQoL of patients who participated in an ERP compared to those who did not. However, a significant decrease in LoS was found when ERP was applied.
trial registrationNot applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.