Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39709361›Full record

ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2024

The discrepant effect of blood glucose on the risk of early and late lung injury: a national cohort study.

Lu Wang, Yicheng Zhou, Xiaojuan Jiao, Qin Zhang, Kun Feng, Yunfeng Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deciphering the Association Between Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance and Chronic Diarrhea and the Mediating Role of Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lu Wang *Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Nanchang University Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang, 330006, China.
Yicheng Zhou *Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, 518033, China.
Xiaojuan JiaoDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Nanchang University Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang, 330006, China.
Qin ZhangDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Nanchang University Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang, 330006, China.
Kun FengPingshan District People's Hospital of Shenzhen, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518118, China. fengkunsz@163.com.
Yunfeng ShenDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Shenzhen, 518033, China. shenyf26@mail.sysu.edu.cn.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China No.82160170the Synthetic Biology Research Funds for the National Key Research and Development Program of China No. 2019YFA0904500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association between glycemic control and short-, and long-term lung health remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between glucose control and overall lung health in a national cohort.

methodsThe analysis included 5610 subjects from NHANES 2007-2012. We assessed the correlation of glycemic status with respiratory symptoms (cough, sputum, wheeze, and exertional dyspnea), lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1-s (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC)), and obstructive or restrictive lung disease (RLD). Furthermore, we determined all-cause mortality in patients with restrictive lung disease by linking data to the National Mortality Index records up to December 31, 2019.

resultsThe study involved the examination of respiratory symptoms, pulmonary function tests, and mortality analyses encompassing 3714, 3916, and 173 subjects, respectively. Multifactorial regression analyses revealed that a 1% increase in blood glucose was associated with a reduction in effect sizes (β) for FVC and FEV1 by -1.66% (-2.47%, -0.86%) and -1.94% (-2.65%, -1.23%), respectively. This increase also exhibited correlations with an elevated risk of exertional dyspnoea, restrictive ventilation dysfunction, and all-cause mortality, presenting odds ratios (ORs) of 1.19 (1.06, 1.33), 1.22 (1.10, 1.36), and 1.61 (1.29, 2.01), respectively. Regarding glycemic control, patients with improved control demonstrated stronger associations with early lung damage, significantly correlating with reduced FVC (β -10.90%, [-14.45%, -7.36%]) and FEV1 (β -9.38%, [-12.90%, -5.87%]). Moreover, they experienced a notably higher risk of exertional dyspnoea (adjusted OR 2.09, [1.35- 3.24]), while the diabetic group with poorer glycemic control showed more significant connections with advanced lung damage. This group exhibited significant associations with an increased risk of restrictive ventilatory dysfunction (adjusted OR, 2.56, [1.70-3.86]) and all-cause mortality (hazard ratios [HRs] 2.65, [1.05-6.67]), all compared to the reference group with normal glycemic metabolism.

conclusionsElevated blood glucose exhibited an inverse correlation with both long-term and short-term lung health. A negative L-shaped relationship was observed between glycemic control and early lung injury, along with a linearly negative association concerning late-stage lung damage. Given the cross-sectional nature of this study, a longitudinal investigation is needed to validate our findings.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseLung InjuryAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleForced Expiratory VolumeHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutrition SurveysRespiratory Function TestsRisk FactorsUnited StatesVital CapacityBlood GlucoseGlycemic controlLung healthMortalityNHANESObstructive lung function impairmentPulmonary functionRespiratory symptomsRestrictive lung function impairment

Identifiers

PMID39709361
PMCPMC11662551

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.