ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Relationships between blood cadmium concentration and risk of nine cancers: evidence from the NHANES 1999-2018 and Mendelian randomization analyses.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nuclear SUMOylation and Proteotoxic Stress Responses to Metals with Different Ligand Preferences.Chemical research in toxicology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrevious observational studies examining the relationship between cadmium exposure and various cancers have yielded conflicting results. This study aims to comprehensively clarify the relationship between blood cadmium concentration (BCC) and nine specific cancers.
methodsA retrospective analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2018 identified 36,991 participants. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between BCC and the risk of nine specific cancers. Additionally, Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses were conducted to investigate potential causal relationships.
resultsMultivariable logistic regression analysis of the NHANES data indicated a positive association between BCC and the risk of bladder and lung cancers (P < 0.05) and a negative association with the risk of kidney and prostate cancers (P < 0.05). The MR analyses demonstrated a causal relationship between BCC and kidney cancer (P < 0.05). Additionally, it uncovered causal associations with breast, cervical, and colon cancers (P < 0.05).
conclusionElevated BCC was associated with an increased risk of bladder and lung cancers while demonstrating an inverse relationship with kidney and prostate cancers. MR analysis revealed that cadmium exposure may act as a protective factor against breast, cervical, colon, and kidney cancers, that must be confirmed with new studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.