Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39710199›Full record

ReviewWorld neurosurgery2025

The Evolution of Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Valves and Why They Fail.

Brianna N Stehlik, Bryan C Good, Stephanie C TerMaath

Abstract readReviewHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Review in World neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brianna N StehlikDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Bryan C GoodDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Stephanie C TerMaathDepartment of Mechanical, Aerospace, and Biomedical Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA. Electronic address: stermaat@utk.edu.

Funding

Characterization of Ventricular Catheter Performance for Improved Treatment of Pediatric HydrocephalusR15EB026196 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE KNOXVILLE · PI TERMAATH, STEPHANIE CARMELLA · 2018 to 2018
$430k
NIBIB NIH HHS R15 EB026196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article reviews the historical progression of ventriculoperitoneal shunt valve designs with the goal of providing an understanding of their functionality and failure mechanisms. While shunting is the predominant treatment for hydrocephalus, the statistics of overall shunt failure remain high, and valve failure is responsible for a significant percentage of revision surgeries. Therefore, this review spans valve evolution from an engineering perspective with an emphasis on discussing potential failure mechanisms and patient-specific valve selection. Information is provided on the importance of valves in hydrocephalus treatment with discussion on each class of valves and their advantages and shortcomings. Substantial development over decades has significantly improved valve functionality, and ongoing research continues to provide more robust valves and shunt systems for hydrocephalus management.

Indexed as

HydrocephalusProsthesis FailureVentriculoperitoneal ShuntEquipment DesignEquipment FailureHistory, 20th CenturyHumansReoperationFailureHistoryPatient-specificProgrammableValveVentriculoperitoneal shunt

Identifiers

PMID39710199
PMCPMC11859756

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.