Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39710433›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024

Annotating publicly-available samples and studies using interpretable modeling of unstructured metadata.

Hao Yuan, Parker Hicks, Mansooreh Ahmadian, Kayla A Johnson, Lydia Valtadoros, Arjun Krishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hao YuanGenetics and Genome Sciences Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48823, United States.
Parker HicksDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Mansooreh AhmadianDepartment of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Kayla A JohnsonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Lydia ValtadorosDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.
Arjun KrishnanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, United States.

Funding

National Science Foundation 2328140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reusing massive collections of publicly available biomedical data can significantly impact knowledge discovery. However, these public samples and studies are typically described using unstructured plain text, hindering the findability and further reuse of the data. To combat this problem, we propose txt2onto 2.0, a general-purpose method based on natural language processing and machine learning for annotating biomedical unstructured metadata to controlled vocabularies of diseases and tissues. Compared to the previous version (txt2onto 1.0), which uses numerical embeddings as features, this new version uses words as features, resulting in improved interpretability and performance, especially when few positive training instances are available. Txt2onto 2.0 uses embeddings from a large language model during prediction to deal with unseen-yet-relevant words related to each disease and tissue term being predicted from the input text, thereby explaining the basis of every annotation. We demonstrate the generalizability of txt2onto 2.0 by accurately predicting disease annotations for studies from independent datasets, using proteomics and clinical trials as examples. Overall, our approach can annotate biomedical text regardless of experimental types or sources. Code, data, and trained models are available at https://github.com/krishnanlab/txt2onto2.0.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMetadataNatural Language ProcessingComputational BiologyHumansProteomicsVocabulary, Controlledbiomedical metadatadata reusemachine learningnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID39710433
PMCPMC11663484

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.