ArticleBMC cancer2024
Circulating tumor DNA detection improves relapse prediction in epithelial ovarian cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- DNA-Based Liquid Biopsy for Evaluating Surgical and Postsurgical Outcomes in Gynecologic Malignancies: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Pooled it
- The role of circulating tumor DNA in ovarian cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting recurrence in epithelial ovarian cancer after primary cytoreductive surgery: A single-center retrospective study.Pakistan journal of medical sciences · 2026Article
- Minimal Residual Disease Detection: Bridging Molecular and Clinical Strategies for Recurrence Prevention in Gynecologic Cancers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Prognostic Value of FOXL2 Mutant Circulating Tumor DNA in Adult Granulosa Cell Tumor Patients.Cancers · 2025Article
- Review
- Prognostic value of circulating HPV cell-free DNA in cervical cancer using liquid biopsy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEpithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is a lethal form of gynecological malignancy. Some EOC patients experience relapse after standard primary debulking surgery (PDS) and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). Identifying molecular residual disease (MRD) by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection can timely signal the potential for relapse. However, research on the usage of ctDNA for MRD detection in EOC is limited.
methodsFifty-one EOC patients who received standard PDS and ACT were included. Targeted sequencing based on a panel of 1021 cancer-related genes, along with further validation using Enrich-rare-mutation sequencing, was performed on tumor tissues acquired during PDS and on plasma samples collected before and after PDS/ACT to identify variants reflecting tumor signals.
resultsPost-surgery MRD was associated with relapse (Log-rank p = 0.0006) and was identified as an independent prognostic factor (HR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.02-11.42; p = 0.047). The negative and positive predictive values were 0.83 and 0.62 respectively. Additionally, post-surgery MRD outperformed CA125 in predicting relapse, and integrating both parameters could provide more accurate risk stratification. Post-ACT MRD detection identified the patients with ctDNA clearance who were still at risk of relapse. Furthermore, baseline ctDNA detection could help determine patients who are not suitable for further tests after surgery.
conclusionsPost-surgery MRD is superior to CA125 in predicting relapse in EOC. Patients exhibiting transient ctDNA clearance, as evaluated by post-ACT MRD, may require longitudinal monitoring. Baseline ctDNA detection could help determine whether post-surgery ctDNA monitoring should be performed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.