ArticleJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology2025
Long-term Impact of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Assistance on Glycemic Control in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Following the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake
Article in Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the impact of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) assistance on glycemic control in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in earthquake-affected regions, comparing those who benefited from CGM with those who did not. Additionally, the study assessed changes in CGM metrics over nine months of CGM use. Methods: A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted across 11 centers in Türkiye. Children with T1D were divided into two groups: those who received CGM support (CGM+) and those who continued with finger-stick glucose monitoring (CGM-). Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were measured at four intervals: pre-earthquake, 3-6 months, 6-9 months, and 9-12 months post-earthquake. In the second phase, CGM metrics were analyzed over 90-day intervals in the CGM+ group with at least 85% sensor usage. Results: A total of 532 children were included. Median HbA1c levels decreased from 9.1% pre-earthquake to 8.8% 3-6 months postearthquake (p=0.027). In the CGM+ group, HbA1c levels significantly decreased from 8.8% to 8.3% (p<0.001), while no significant change was observed in the CGM- group. Of the 412 subjects with access to CGM reports, 105 (25.4%) had less than 85% sensor usage and were excluded. In the remaining 307 patients, there was a significant increase in active sensor time and daily glucose measurements, along with a reduction in hypoglycemia frequency over the 90-day intervals (p<0.001 for all three). Conclusion: CGM assistance improved glycemic control in children with T1D, even under the challenging conditions following a devastating earthquake. These findings highlight the need for broader access to CGM devices to enhance diabetes management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.