Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39711113›Full record

ArticleGut microbes2025

A modelling framework to characterize the impact of antibiotics on the gut microbiota diversity.

Carlos Olivares, Etienne Ruppé, Stéphanie Ferreira, Tanguy Corbel, Antoine Andremont, Jean de Gunzburg, Jeremie Guedj, Charles Burdet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mapping 25 years of research on gut microbiota and antibiotic resistance: bibliometric insights and future directions.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Antibiotic-related dysbiosis of gut microbiota in healthy volunteers: a comparative study of ceftazidime-avibactam, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ceftriaxone.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carlos OlivaresUniversité Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM, Paris, France.
Etienne RuppéUniversité Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1178-0298
Stéphanie FerreiraDa Volterra, Paris, France.
Tanguy CorbelDa Volterra, Paris, France.
Antoine AndremontUniversité Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM, Paris, France.
Jean de GunzburgDa Volterra, Paris, France.
Jeremie GuedjUniversité Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5534-5482
Charles BurdetUniversité Paris Cité, IAME, INSERM, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4138-0794

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metagenomic sequencing deepened our knowledge about the role of the intestinal microbiota in human health, and several studies with various methodologies explored its dynamics during antibiotic treatments. We compared the impact of four widely used antibiotics on the gut bacterial diversity. We used plasma and fecal samples collected during and after treatment from healthy volunteers assigned to a 5-day treatment either by ceftriaxone (1 g every 24 h through IV route), ceftazidime/avibactam (2 g/500 mg every 8 h through IV route), piperacillin/tazobactam (1 g/500 mg every 8 h through IV route) or moxifloxacin (400 mg every 24 h through oral route). Antibiotic concentrations were measured in plasma and feces, and bacterial diversity was assessed by the Shannon index from 16S rRNA gene profiling. The relationship between the evolutions of antibiotic fecal exposure and bacterial diversity was modeled using non-linear mixed effects models. We compared the impact of antibiotics on gut microbiota diversity by simulation, using various reconstructed pharmacodynamic indices. Piperacillin/tazobactam was characterized by the highest impact in terms of intensity of perturbation (maximal [IQR] loss of diversity of 27.3% [1.9; 40.0]), while moxifloxacin had the longest duration of perturbation, with a time to return to 95% of baseline value after the last administration of 13.2 d [8.3; 19.1]. Overall, moxifloxacin exhibited the highest global impact, followed by piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and ceftriaxone. Their AUC between day 0 and day 42 of the change of diversity indices from day 0 were, respectively, -13.2 Shannon unit.day [-20.4; -7.9], -10.9 Shannon unit.day [-20.4; -0.6] and -10.1 Shannon unit.day [-18.3; -4.6]. We conclude that antibiotics alter the intestinal diversity to varying degrees, both within and between antibiotics families. Such studies are needed to help antibiotic stewardship in using the antibiotics with the lowest impact on the intestinal microbiota.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAdultAzabicyclo CompoundsBiodiversityCeftazidimeCeftriaxoneDrug CombinationsFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMoxifloxacinAnti-Bacterial Agentsavibactam, ceftazidime drug combinationAzabicyclo CompoundsCeftazidimeCeftriaxoneDrug CombinationsMoxifloxacinPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationRNA, Ribosomal, 16SantibioticsHuman gut microbiotametagenomicsnonlinear mixed effect modelingpharmacodynamicspharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID39711113
PMCPMC12931723

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.