ReviewCognitive neurodynamics2024
Advancements in automated diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder through deep learning and resting-state functional mri biomarkers: a systematic review.
Review in Cognitive neurodynamics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Artificial intelligence support for diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders during childhood: an umbrella review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Temporally-resolved deep learning reveals autism symptom-specific neural signatures during naturalistic social experiences.Research square · 2026Article
- Decision Support Systems in Neurosurgery: Current Applications and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- AI-driven early diagnosis of specific mental disorders: a comprehensive study.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2025Article
- Leveraging AI-Driven Neuroimaging Biomarkers for Early Detection and Social Function Prediction in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Deep learning-based feature selection for detection of autism spectrum disorder.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Dynamic mode decomposition of resting-state fMRI revealing abnormal brain region features in schizophrenia.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autism Spectrum Disorder(ASD) is a type of neurological disorder that is common among children. The diagnosis of this disorder at an early stage is the key to reducing its effects. The major symptoms include anxiety, lack of communication, and less social interaction. This paper presents a systematic review conducted based on PRISMA guidelines for automated diagnosis of ASD. With rapid development in the field of Data Science, numerous methods have been proposed that can diagnose the disease at an early stage which can minimize the effects of the disorder. Machine learning and deep learning have proven suitable techniques for the automated diagnosis of ASD. These models have been developed on various datasets such as ABIDE I and ABIDE II, a frequently used dataset based on rs-fMRI images. Approximately 26 articles have been reviewed after the screening process. The paper highlights a comparison between different algorithms used and their accuracy as well. It was observed that most researchers used DL algorithms to develop the ASD detection model. Different accuracies were recorded with a maximum accuracy close to 0.99. Recommendations for future work have also been discussed in a later section. This analysis derived a conclusion that AI-emerged DL and ML technologies can diagnose ASD through rs-fMRI images with maximum accuracy. The comparative analysis has been included to show the accuracy range.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.