Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712565›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of methodology2024

Biobanks and biomarkers: Their current and future role in biomedical research.

Michael Colwill, Samantha Baillie, Richard Pollok, Andrew Poullis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael ColwillDepartment of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, United Kingdom. michael.colwill@nhs.net.
Samantha BaillieDepartment of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, United Kingdom.
Richard PollokDepartment of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, United Kingdom.
Andrew PoullisDepartment of Gastroenterology, St George's University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London SW17 0QT, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance and utility of biobanks has increased exponentially since their inception and creation. Initially used as part of translational research, they now contribute over 40% of data for all cancer research papers in the United States of America and play a crucial role in all aspects of healthcare. Multiple classification systems exist but a simplified approach is to either classify as population-based or disease-oriented entities. Whilst historically publicly funded institutions, there has been a significant increase in industry funded entities across the world which has changed the dynamic of biobanks offering new possibilities but also new challenges. Biobanks face legal questions over data sharing and intellectual property as well as ethical and sustainability questions particularly as the world attempts to move to a low-carbon economy. International collaboration is required to address some of these challenges but this in itself is fraught with complexity and difficulty. This review will examine the current utility of biobanks in the modern healthcare setting as well as the current and future challenges these vital institutions face.

Indexed as

BiobanksBiomarkersBiomedical researchResearch ethicsResearch methodology

Identifiers

PMID39712565
PMCPMC11287535

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.