ArticleCureus2024
The Prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medications Among Patients With Diabetic Nephropathy: A Cross-Sectional Study Conducted at a Tertiary Care Hospital.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Diabetic nephropathy is a serious complication of diabetes that significantly increases the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A critical concern in managing patients with diabetic nephropathy is the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), which can exacerbate kidney dysfunction and lead to adverse health outcomes. PIMs are defined as medications whose risks outweigh their benefits, particularly when safer alternatives are available. The exact prevalence of the potentially inappropriate fraction of this as well as factors associated with the prescription of these medications remains variable. This study seeks to investigate the prevalence of PIMs in a diabetic population with CKD, aiming to identify the factors that contribute to this issue. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study analyzing clinical and electronic data from patients with diabetic nephropathy who were receiving care in the wards and outpatient clinics of Hamad Medical Corporation. Data were extracted from medical records, encompassing demographic information, comorbidities, prescribed medications, and kidney function, measured as estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria was employed to identify PIMs in older adults. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests for categorical variables and logistic regression to identify factors associated with PIM prescriptions. Results Of the 860 patients analyzed, 248 (28.8%) were prescribed at least one PIM. The most commonly prescribed classes of PIMs were sulfonylureas and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Significant factors associated with PIM prescriptions included older age (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.21-1.92), lower eGFR (OR 1.67, 95% CI 1.28-2.19), and polypharmacy (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.42-2.36). Conclusion In this examination of the combined inpatient and outpatient database of patients with diabetic nephropathy, we identified a high prevalence of PIMs, particularly in individuals of older age, those with lower eGFR, and those experiencing polypharmacy. The findings underscore the importance of addressing polypharmacy through targeted therapeutic interventions aimed at reducing the use of PIMs in this population. By implementing such strategies, we can enhance medication safety and improve overall health outcomes for patients with diabetic nephropathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.