ReviewCureus2024
Advancements in the Management of Fragility Fractures in Orthopaedic Patients.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Under-recognized, under-referred: a multidisciplinary evaluation of fragility fracture management in the emergency setting.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Kano Model-Based Analysis of Medical and Nursing Service Needs of Fracture Patients and Their Families.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- In vitro testing of a novel implant for angular stabilisation of the posterior pelvic ring.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis-Current Understanding and Open Questions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Osteoporosis is a major risk factor for fragility fractures. The British Orthopaedics Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) and Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) guidelines on fragility fracture management highlight the need to initiate prompt, coordinated multidisciplinary care with a focus on early mobilisation to improve patient outcomes. Medical management of fragility fractures focuses on the prevention of progressive frailty. Advancements in medical therapy include romosozumab, recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance in patients with imminent fracture risk, which improves overall bone mineral density. Regional nerve blocks are an increasingly common form of perioperative anaesthesia with fewer side effects than opioids and rates of postoperative delirium. Surgical management of osteoporotic fractures poses unique challenges, such as complex fracture patterns and increased risk of implant failure. The surgical approach to fragility fractures has undergone major advancements over the past 20 years, with developments such as polyaxial locking and far cortical locking systems that achieve secondary bone healing, as well as cement augmented screw fixation to provide stable fixation in osteoporotic bone. The development of minimally invasive surgical approaches has led to improved periosteal blood flow around a fracture site, as well as reduced operating time, hospital stay, and time to pain-free weight-bearing. In the future, we are likely to see a focus on minimally invasive surgical techniques for vertebral and pelvic fragility fractures to improve patients' mobility and independence before discharge, subsequently improving quality of life and preventing progressive frailty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.