Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39712828›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Advancements in the Management of Fragility Fractures in Orthopaedic Patients.

Saskia Locke, James Doonan, Bryn Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Saskia LockeOrthopaedics, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, GBR.
James DoonanOrthopaedics, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, GBR.
Bryn JonesOrthopaedics, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteoporosis is a major risk factor for fragility fractures. The British Orthopaedics Association Standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics (BOAST) and Getting it Right First Time (GIRFT) guidelines on fragility fracture management highlight the need to initiate prompt, coordinated multidisciplinary care with a focus on early mobilisation to improve patient outcomes. Medical management of fragility fractures focuses on the prevention of progressive frailty. Advancements in medical therapy include romosozumab, recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance in patients with imminent fracture risk, which improves overall bone mineral density. Regional nerve blocks are an increasingly common form of perioperative anaesthesia with fewer side effects than opioids and rates of postoperative delirium. Surgical management of osteoporotic fractures poses unique challenges, such as complex fracture patterns and increased risk of implant failure. The surgical approach to fragility fractures has undergone major advancements over the past 20 years, with developments such as polyaxial locking and far cortical locking systems that achieve secondary bone healing, as well as cement augmented screw fixation to provide stable fixation in osteoporotic bone. The development of minimally invasive surgical approaches has led to improved periosteal blood flow around a fracture site, as well as reduced operating time, hospital stay, and time to pain-free weight-bearing. In the future, we are likely to see a focus on minimally invasive surgical techniques for vertebral and pelvic fragility fractures to improve patients' mobility and independence before discharge, subsequently improving quality of life and preventing progressive frailty.

Indexed as

clinical frailty scalefragility fracturesfrailtylocking plate fixationminimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (mipo)osteoporosispelvic fracturesperipheral nerve blockregional anaesthesiavertebral fracture

Identifiers

PMID39712828
PMCPMC11661880

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.