ReviewCureus2024
Carbon Monoxide in Healthcare Monitoring Balancing Potential and Challenges in Public Health Perspective: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carbon monoxide (CO) has medicinal potential and harmful qualities. However, excessive exposure to CO can lead to severe organ failure. CO is exogenously and endogenously generated within the human body. Ongoing research aims to uncover the beneficial aspects of CO. It serves as a biomarker for inflammation and other serious illnesses. Preclinical trials exploring CO's application have indicated potential benefits in addressing conditions such as Ischemia, Tendonitis, Neuropathic pain, and even cancer therapy. Cardiovascular disease emerges as a particularly promising target for CO therapy due to its potent vasodilatory effects. While research into CO-based therapeutics has shown promise in experimental and preclinical settings, clinical translation and widespread adoption remain in the early stages. This review will illuminate the advantageous role of CO as a biomarker alongside the obstacles and challenges associated with its implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.