ArticlePloS one2024
Comprehensive characterization of high-risk coding and non-coding single nucleotide polymorphisms of human CXCR4 gene.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
CXCR4, a chemokine receptor known as Fusin or CD184, spans the outer membrane of various human cells, including leukocytes. This receptor is essential for HIV infection as well as for many vital cellular processes and is implicated to be associated with multiple pathologies, including cancers. This study employs various computational tools to investigate the molecular effects of disease-vulnerable germ-line missense and non-coding SNPs of the CXCR4 gene. In this investigation, the tools SIFT, PROVEAN, PolyPhen-2, PANTHER, SNAP 2.0, PhD-SNP, and SNPs&GO were used to predict potentially harmful and disease-causing nsSNPs in CXCR4. Additionally, their impact on protein stability was examined by I-mutant 3.0, MUpro, Consurf, and Netsurf 2.0, combined with conservation and solvent accessibility analyses. Structural analysis with normal and mutant residues of the protein harboring these disease-associated functional SNPs was conducted using TM-align and SWIS MODEL, with visualization aided by PyMOL and the BIOVINA Discovery Studio Visualizer. The functional impact of wild-type and mutated CXCR4 variants was evaluated through molecular docking with its natural ligand CXCR4-modulator 1, using the PyRx tool. Non-coding SNPs in the 3' -UTR were investigated for their regulatory effects on miRNA binding sites using PolymiRTS. Five non-coding SNPs were identified in the 3'-UTR that can disrupt existing miRNA binding sites or create new ones. Non-coding SNPs in the 5' and 3'-UTRs, as well as in intronic regions, were also examined for their potential roles in gene expression regulation. Furthermore, RegulomeDB databases were employed to assess the regulatory potential of these non-coding SNPs based on chromatin state and protein binding regulation. In the mostly annotated variant (ENSP00000241393) of the CXCR4 gene, we found 23 highly deleterious and pathogenic nsSNPs and these were selected for in-depth analysis. Among the 23 nsSNPs, five (G55V, H79P, L80P, H113P, and P299L) displayed notable structural alternation, with elevated RMSD values and reduced TM (TM-score) values. A molecular docking study revealed the significant impact of the H113P variant on the protein-ligand binding affinity, supported by MD simulation over 100 nanoseconds, which highlighted substantial stability differences between wild-type and H113P mutated proteins during ligand binding. This comprehensive analysis shed light on the potential functional consequences of genetic variation in the CXCR genes, offering valuable insights into the implications of disease susceptibility and may pave the way for future therapeutic interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.