Evidence mapPaperPMID 39715731Full record

SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2025

A meta-analysis assessing reliability of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: Implications for compulsive eating and obesity.

Haitham Jahrami, Waqar Husain, Khaled Trabelsi, Achraf Ammar, Seithikurippu R Pandi-Perumal, Zahra Saif, Marc N Potenza, Chung-Ying Lin, Amir H Pakpour

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A meta-analysis assessing reliability of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: Implications for compulsive eating and obesity.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Haitham JahramiGovernment Hospitals, Manama, Bahrain.ORCID 0000-0001-8990-1320
Waqar HusainDepartment of Humanities, COMSATS University Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0003-3047-1834
Khaled TrabelsiHigh Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.ORCID 0000-0003-2623-9557
Achraf AmmarDepartment of Training and Movement Science, Institute of Sport Science, Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0347-8053
Seithikurippu R Pandi-PerumalCentre for Research and Development, Chandigarh University, Mohali, Punjab, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8686-7259
Zahra SaifGovernment Hospitals, Manama, Bahrain.ORCID 0000-0003-2749-3274
Marc N PotenzaDepartment of Psychiatry and Neuroscience and the Child Study Center and Wu Tsai Institute, Yale School of Medicine/Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Chung-Ying LinInstitute of Allied Health Sciences, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2129-4242
Amir H PakpourDepartment of Nursing, School of Health and Welfare, Jönköping University, Hälsohögskolan, Jönköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8798-5345

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food addiction (FA) is linked to eating disorders and obesity. The Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS), which has various versions in different languages, is widely used to assess FA worldwide. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the YFAS through reliability generalization meta-analysis (REGEMA). From their inception until April 2024, a comprehensive systematic review across more than 30 databases was conducted to identify studies reporting reliability measures (e.g., Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega) of the YFAS. Sixty-five studies were included in this meta-analysis, with a median sample size of 451 participants. The results of the random-effects meta-analysis showed a high pooled reliability coefficient (α = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.83 to 0.86 p < 0.001). Test-retest reliability was also estimated using a random-effects meta-analysis of 10 studies, resulting in a pooled test-retest correlation coefficient of intraclass coefficients of (ICC = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.84, p < 0.001). These findings highlight the consistency and robustness of the YFAS in detecting FA across studies, suggesting its reliability for screening for FA-related disordered eating.

Indexed as

Compulsive BehaviorFood AddictionObesityFeeding BehaviorHumansReproducibility of ResultsCronbach's alphafood addictionmeta‐analysisreliability

Identifiers

PMID39715731
PMCPMC11884959

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.