Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39716061›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2024

Genetic relationship analysis and core collection construction of Eucalyptus grandis from Dongmen improved variety base: the largest eucalypt germplasm resource in China.

Chenhe Li, Lei Zhang, Zhibang Peng, Xia Li, Zhao Liu, Te Lu, Xiangyang Kang, Jun Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chenhe Li *State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Research Center of Tree Breeding and Ecological Restoration, Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Lei Zhang *Guangxi Dongmen Forest Farm, Chongzuo, 532199, China.
Zhibang PengGuangxi Dongmen Forest Farm, Chongzuo, 532199, China.
Xia LiGuangxi Dongmen Forest Farm, Chongzuo, 532199, China.
Zhao LiuState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Research Center of Tree Breeding and Ecological Restoration, Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Te LuScience and Technology Section, Chifeng Research Institute of Forestry Science, Chifeng, 024000, China.
Xiangyang KangState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Research Center of Tree Breeding and Ecological Restoration, Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Jun YangState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, National Engineering Research Center of Tree Breeding and Ecological Restoration, Key Laboratory of Genetics and Breeding in Forest Trees and Ornamental Plants of Ministry of Education, College of Biological Sciences and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China. yang_jun@bjfu.edu.cn.

Funding

5·5 Engineering Research & Innovation Team Project of Beijing Forestry University BLRC2023C06National Key R&D Program of China during the 14th Five-year Plan Period 2021YFD2200105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEucalyptus grandis, which was first comprehensively and systematically introduced to China in the 1980s, is one of the most important fast-growing tree species in the forestry industry. However, to date, no core collection has been selected from the germplasm resources of E. grandis based on growth and genetic relationship analysis.

resultsIn the present study, 545 individuals of E. grandis collected from 28 populations across 5 countries were selected for genetic diversity analysis using 16 selected SSR markers. The polymorphism information content (PIC) was employed to assess genetic diversity, yielding a mean value of 0.707. Genetic structure analysis was conducted on 492 individuals from 13 combined populations, revealing three clusters as the most suitable number. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) demonstrated that the populations were divided into three major clusters. Additionally, the analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) indicated that the majority of variation occurred within populations.

conclusionsBased on the criteria for screening the core collection, we constructed a population consisting of 158 individuals and created unique fingerprinting codes. These results provide a crucial theoretical foundation for the protection and utilization of germplasm resources of E. grandis in China, which will be helpful in the selection of genetically distant parents for future multigenerational hybridization programs.

Indexed as

EucalyptusGenetic VariationMicrosatellite RepeatsChinaPolymorphism, GeneticSeed BankEucalyptus grandisGenetic diversityGuangxiMolecular fingerprintPopulation structureSSR markers

Identifiers

PMID39716061
PMCPMC11667856

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.