SynthesisBMC gastroenterology2024
Efficacy of probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotics supplements in individuals with anemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in BMC gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of combined probiotic and iron-folic acid supplementation on iron status and gut inflammation markers: a randomized controlled trial among anaemic children.European journal of clinical nutrition · 2026Trial
- A Comprehensive Study of Bidirectional Interactions Between the Human Microbiome and Blood Malignancies and Hematologic Conditions: Focus on Novel Therapeutic Strategies.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2026Review
- Retrospective insights into probiotic and prebiotic interventions: associations with gut microbiota profiles and nutritional outcomes.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Functional Food Ingredients Enhancing Immune Health.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Bioconversion of FePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAnemia is a common global health problem, particularly in impoverished regions, with a high incidence rate. The condition is multifactorial, with iron deficiency being one of the most prevalent causes. Current treatment for anemia often relies on iron supplements or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, although these therapies may show limited efficacy for some patients. Recent evidence suggests that probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics, as microbiome modulators, hold significant potential in the treatment of anemia. These interventions may enhance iron absorption and improve overall blood health through their impact on gut microbiota, thus providing an alternative or complementary approach to conventional treatments.
methodsSix databases, including the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science (WOS), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WangFang data library, were searched up to November 20, 2024. Studies published in English and Chinese were included. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics in treating anemia. The experimental groups received probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics, while the control groups received placebo, alternative treatments, or no treatment. The primary outcome was hemoglobin (Hb) levels. Secondary outcomes included serum iron (SI) and serum ferritin (SF). A descriptive analysis was conducted for studies where meta-analysis was not feasible. The GRADE tool was used to assess the quality of evidence, and the Cochrane guidelines were employed to evaluate the risk of bias in each study.
resultsSeven studies were included comprising a total of eight RCTs, with the main types of anemia being iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD), involving 632 patients. The analysis revealed that probiotics, prebiotics, or synbiotics significantly improved Hb levels in patients with anemia (WMD = 10.760, 95% CI: 4.593 to 16.747, p = 0.001), though heterogeneity was high (I² = 96.5%). Two RCTs (n = 120 participants) reported significant increases in serum iron levels in the probiotic group (WMD = 3.835, 95% CI: 3.271 to 4.400), with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 38.7%). Two RCTs (n = 192 participants) reported no significant differences were observed between the groups in serum ferritin levels (WMD = 8.048, p = 0.115), and heterogeneity remained high (I² = 62.6%). Subgroup analyses revealed that probiotics improved Hb levels in renal and iron-deficiency anemia, as well as across different doses. The synbiotic group showed consistent efficacy (I² = 0%), while the prebiotic group did not exhibit significant effects, with extremely high heterogeneity (I² = 99.3%). This indicates that heterogeneity may stem from variations in intervention types, and the results should be interpreted with caution.
conclusionThere is moderate-quality evidence suggesting that probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics may improve anemia management, particularly by enhancing Hb levels. Further high-quality RCTs are required to explore the specific role of synbiotics in anemia management, including their comparative efficacy against probiotics and prebiotics alone, and their impact on gastrointestinal factors such as gut microbiota modulation and inflammation reduction. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42024590073.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.