ArticleBMC surgery2024
Ultrasound guidance in the surgical removal of internal fixators after complete healing of limb fractures.
Article in BMC surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe aim of this study was to determine whether ultrasound guidance can reduce the duration, blood loss volume and invasiveness of surgery for internal fixator removal.
methodsThe clinical data from 35 adults patients who underwent ultrasound-guided surgical removal of internal fixators after complete healing of limb fractures between June 2019 and April 2023 were retrospectively analysed and compared with those from 34 controls who underwent the procedure without ultrasound guidance. Data concerning the patients' demographic and clinical characteristics and surgical sites were collected. Differences in the patients' demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups.
resultsSixty-nine patients were enrolled in the study. Thirty-five patients underwent surgical removal of internal fixators with ultrasound guidance, and the average intraoperative blood loss volume was 15.17 ± 18.54 ml, average difference between the incision length and scar length was 4.24 ± 1.38 cm, average operation time was 60.66 ± 24.30 min, and average ultrasound assessment time was 10.00 ± 3.90 min. Thirty-four patients underwent surgical removal of internal fixators without ultrasound guidance, and the average blood loss volume was 46.76 ± 90.74 ml, average difference between the incision length and scar length was 2.68 ± 1.04 cm, and average operation time was 80.15 ± 58.84 min. The difference between the incision length and scar length was significant (P < 0.01), as was the difference in the intraoperative blood loss volume (P < 0.05) between the two groups.
conclusionUltrasound is a convenient, noninvasive, radiation-free technique that allows dynamic scanning of multiple sections regardless of patient position. Ultrasound-assisted removal of internal fixators might reduce bleeding and therefore the invasiveness of the procedure. Physicians can use ultrasound for preoperative patient positioning, intraoperative monitoring, and postoperative confirmation of complete removal of internal fixators if necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.