ArticleCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2024
Assessment of MGMT promoter methylation status in glioblastoma using deep learning features from multi-sequence MRI of intratumoral and peritumoral regions.
Article in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence for Predicting MGMT Promoter Methylation in Glioblastoma Using MR Imaging: A Systematic Review.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Integrating Radiogenomics and CSF-Based Liquid Biopsy Sequencing for Precision Neuro-Oncology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A transformer-based multimodal deep learning model for preoperative prediction of Ki-67 expression level in glioma.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Review
- Article
- The Evolving Landscape of Radiomics in Gliomas: Insights into Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Research Trends.Cancers · 2025Review
- ATRX, OLIG2, MGMT, and IDH2 in Glioblastoma: Essential Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Significance.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Key parameters in intratumoral-peritumoral region fusion models: optimizing deep learning radiomics for breast cancer diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Explainable, modality-adaptive radiomics for MGMT methylation prediction in high-grade glioma: a decision-curve analysis study.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Radiomics prediction of MGMT promoter methylation in adult diffuse gliomas: a combination of structural MRI, DCE, and DTI.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning features derived from multi-sequence magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in determining the O
methodsClinical, pathological, and MRI data of 356 glioblastoma patients (251 methylated, 105 unmethylated) were retrospectively examined from the public dataset The Cancer Imaging Archive. Each patient underwent preoperative multi-sequence brain MRI scans, which included T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI). Regions of interest (ROIs) were delineated to identify the necrotic tumor core (NCR), enhancing tumor (ET), and peritumoral edema (PED). The ET and NCR regions were categorized as intratumoral ROIs, whereas the PED region was categorized as peritumoral ROIs. Predictive models were developed using the Transformer algorithm based on intratumoral, peritumoral, and combined MRI features. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was employed to assess predictive performance.
resultsThe ROI-based models of intratumoral and peritumoral regions, utilizing deep learning algorithms on multi-sequence MRI, were capable of predicting MGMT promoter methylation status in glioblastoma patients. The combined model of intratumoral and peritumoral regions exhibited superior diagnostic performance relative to individual models, achieving an AUC of 0.923 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.890 - 0.948) in stratified cross-validation, with sensitivity and specificity of 86.45% and 87.62%, respectively.
conclusionThe deep learning model based on MRI data can effectively distinguish between glioblastoma patients with and without MGMT promoter methylation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.