Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39716850›Full record

ReviewNanomedicine (London, England)2025

Versatility of electrospun Janus wound dressings.

Deng-Guang Yu, Wei He, Cui He, Hui Liu, Haisong Yang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomedicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Electrospun nanofibers and their application as sensors for healthcare.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Deng-Guang YuSchool of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Wei HeSchool of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Cui HeSchool of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Hui LiuSchool of Materials and Chemistry, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Haisong YangDepartment of Orthopedics, 411 hospital, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrospun nanofibers produced through single-fluid blending processes have successfully demonstrated their potential as highly effective wound dressings. However, electrospun Janus nanofibers, in which various chambers can be designed to load different active pharmaceutical ingredients into different polymeric matrices, are further exhibiting their versatility for promoting wound healing. This commentary declares that wound dressings always need multiple functional performances to promote wound healing. Janus nanofibers have their unique advantages, with different parts interacting with their environments, thereby providing a versatile platform for developing novel wound dressings. Two recent examples, each with a different preparation strategy for developing novel wound dressings, are discussed, and the promising future of Janus nanofibers in wound dressing applications is highlighted.

Indexed as

BandagesNanofibersWound HealingAnimalsHumansPolymersPolymersJanus nanofibersmultiple functionsnanostructuresside-by-side electrospinningWound dressing

Identifiers

PMID39716850
PMCPMC11852743

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.