ReviewHepatology (Baltimore, Md.)2026
Reprogramming macrophages to treat liver diseases.
Review in Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progressive suppression of regulated cell death defines terminal macrophage states in liver cirrhosis.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Harnessing macrophage signaling pathways and scalable engineering for next-generation immunotherapies.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Antifibrotic therapies for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2025Review
- Chronic Inflammation and Immune Dysregulation in Metabolic-Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Progression: From Steatosis to Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Decoding the heterogeneity of liver-resident macrophages in chronic liver diseases: therapeutic responses to immunomodulatory strategies.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Identification of secretory protein related biomarkers for primary biliary cholangitis based on machine learning and experimental validation.Open life sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutting-edge research has expanded our understanding of the macrophage activation programs in liver diseases making this immune cell type a therapeutic target. Clinical data on macrophage infiltration and polarization states have been used to help predict mortality or poor prognosis in patients with liver cirrhosis and/or HCC. The latest single-cell and spatial transcriptomics studies have dissected unforeseen aspects depicting the immense heterogeneity of macrophages and their multifaceted role in both promoting and resolving hepatic inflammation, injury, and fibrosis. Hepatic macrophages (resident tissue KCs and monocyte-derived macrophages) display such plasticity and phenotypic diversity that macrophages with antagonistic functions may coexist in adjacent regions of the liver. In this scenario, the analysis of macrophage-derived inflammatory and anti-inflammatory circulating soluble markers in patients with liver disease only offers a partial picture of the full complexity of the hepatic macrophage subsets. The reprogramming of macrophages involves understanding the multiple regulatory mechanisms and diverse populations of hepatic macrophages and the design of macrophage-targeted therapeutic interventions to restore hepatic homeostasis. Here we review the potential targets to modulate macrophage behavior in liver diseases and nanoscale therapeutics that aim to target and treat macrophages. We will summarize current knowledge on the diverse macrophage programs activated in chronic liver inflammation, cirrhosis, and HCC that may be of therapeutic interest for precision medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.