Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39717159›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2025

Prognostic impact of coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with myocardial infarction evaluated by new angiography-derived index of microvascular resistance.

Benoit Caullery, Laurent Riou, Stephanie Marliere, Estelle Vautrin, Nicolas Piliero, Olivier Ormerzzano, Helene Bouvaist, Gerald Vanzetto, Gilles Barone-Rochette

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Unveiling the Microvasculature: The Index of Microcirculatory Resistance and Its Expanding Role in Cardiovascular Care.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Benoit CaulleryDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Laurent RiouUniversity Grenoble Alpes, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, LRB, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Stephanie MarliereDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Estelle VautrinDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Nicolas PilieroDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Olivier OrmerzzanoDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Helene BouvaistDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Gerald VanzettoDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.
Gilles Barone-RochetteDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital, 38000 Grenoble, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Several methods for measuring IMR derived from angiography have been developed. AngioIMR is a novel method for the assessment of angiography-derived IMR with no requirement for a wire and hyperemia. The prognostic value of AngioIMR is unknown in STEMI patients. We aimed to provide the prognostic value of AngioIMR in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: This study included patients with STEMI who underwent invasive coronary angiography and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). AngioIMR was calculated using computational flow and pressure simulation immediately after PPCI. The presence of significant coronary microvascular dysfunction was defined as AngioIMR > 40. The primary outcome was a composite of all cause death or hospitalization for heart failure (MACE). Results: A total of 178 patients were included (65.0 ± 12.8 years on average, 74 % male gender). An AngioIMR > 40 was found in 72 patients. During a median follow-up of 2.9 (2.3-6.9) years, a primary endpoint was observed in 56 patients. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the risk of MACE was significantly higher in patients with AngioIMR > 40 (log-rank P < 0.01). An Angio IMR > 40 was significantly associated with the occurrence of the primary endpoint in univariate (70 % vs 27 %; hazard ratio 4.519; 95 % CI: 2.550-8.009; p < 0.0001) and multivariate analysis (Hazard ratio 4.282; 95 % CI: 2.325-7.886; p < 0.0001). AngioIMR model showed incremental prognostic value compared to a model with clinical and imaging risk predictors (C-index 0.84 vs 0.79; p = 0.04). Conlusion: Elevated AngioIMR showed a independent prognostic significance in STEMI patients. In addition to well-known risk factors, assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction can be a feasible approach for early prevention and a therapeutic target in STEMI patients.

Indexed as

AngioIMRCoronary microvascular dysfunctionCoronary physiologySTEMI

Identifiers

PMID39717159
PMCPMC11665694

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.