Evidence mapPaperPMID 39717563Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024

Outcomes of Anti-VEGF Therapy in Eyes with Diabetic Macular Edema, Vein Occlusion-Related Macular Edema, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Systematic Review.

Laila Salah Aldokhail, Abdulaziz Mohammad Alhadlaq, Lujain Mohamed Alaradi, Lamees Mohamed Alaradi, Fatimah Yaseen AlShaikh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Molecular stress and neurovascular injury in the diabetic retina.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laila Salah AldokhailDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0008-1027-5506
Abdulaziz Mohammad AlhadlaqDivision of Ophthalmology, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, Ophthalmology Department, College of Medicine, Qassim university, Qassim, Saudi Arabia.
Lujain Mohamed AlaradiDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Lamees Mohamed AlaradiDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0005-8020-5755
Fatimah Yaseen AlShaikhDepartment of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0008-0232-6756

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy has revolutionized the management of various ocular conditions, including diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO)-related macular edema (ME), and neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). However, there remains a need to systematically assess its effectiveness across these distinct conditions. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted to identify studies evaluating the efficacy of anti-VEGF therapy in improving ocular outcomes in patients with DME, RVO-related ME, and nAMD. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles published up to 2024. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were critically appraised, and data on the proportion of patients gaining ≥15 Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean change in BCVA (ETDRS letters), and reduction in central macular thickness (CMT) (μm) were extracted and synthesized. Results: The systematic review identified 18 studies comprising randomized controlled trials, prospective studies, retrospective analyses, and observational studies. Anti-VEGF therapy demonstrated efficacy across all three conditions, with varying proportions of patients experiencing improvements in BCVA and reductions in CMT. Notably, the proportion of patients gaining ≥15 ETDRS letters ranged from 18.1% to 44.8% in DME, while mean changes in BCVA ranged from +4.2 letters to +21.4 letters in RVO-related ME and nAMD. Reductions in CMT ranged from 183.1 μm to 294 μm in DME and RVO-related ME. Conclusion: Anti-VEGF therapy represents a cornerstone in the management of DME, RVO-related ME, and nAMD, with significant improvements observed in BCVA and reductions in CMT across diverse patient populations. While our findings support the effectiveness of anti-VEGF therapy in improving ocular outcomes, further research is warranted to compare its efficacy with alternative treatment modalities and to elucidate its long-term safety profile.

Indexed as

anti-VEGFdiabetic macular edemaneovascular AMDoutcomesretinal vein occlusion

Identifiers

PMID39717563
PMCPMC11663998

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.