ArticleThe Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences2025
The impact of the muscle mass-to-fat ratio on the prognosis of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.
Article in The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Total and regional fat-to-muscle mass ratio and risks of pan-cancer: a prospective cohort study.BMC medicine · 2025Article
- The impact of the muscle mass-to-fat ratio on the prognosis of patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer.The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Nutritional strategies in abdominal surgery: the potential of ketogenic diet.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To evaluate the relationship between the muscle mass-to-fat ratio (MMFR) at the third lumbar spine (L3) and overall survival (OS) as well as related complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic cancer. Patients who underwent PD for pancreatic cancer between March 2017 and May 2023 at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were included. Muscle mass and fat content at the L3 were measured by computed tomography. The specific formula that was used to calculate the MMFR was total abdominal muscle area/(subcutaneous adipose tissue area + visceral adipose tissue area), and the optimal cutoff values of the MMFR based on receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.688 for males and 0.382 for females. Patient characteristics were collected, and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the impact of the MMFR on prognosis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to compare OS between the high-MMFR and low-MMFR groups. On the basis of the optimal cutoff values, 191 patients were divided into two groups, with 91 patients in the low-MMFR group and 100 patients in the high-MMFR group. The incidence of POPF was significantly greater in the low-MMFR group than in the high-MMFR group. According to multivariate analysis, the MMFR was an independent factor associated with POPF and OS. Patients with low MMFRs had significantly shorter OS and a greater POPF incidence than did those with high MMFRs. The MMFR is an independent predictor of POPF and affects the OS of patients undergoing PD for pancreatic cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.