SynthesisBrain structure & function2024
Meta-analytic connectivity perturbation analysis (MACPA): a new method for enhanced precision in fMRI connectivity analysis.
Synthesis in Brain structure & function, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- fNIRS cortical activation in Tai Chi observational learning.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Co-activation of distinct brain areas provides a valuable measure of functional interaction, or connectivity, between them. One well-validated way to investigate the co-activation patterns of a precise area is meta-analytic connectivity modeling (MACM), which performs a seed-based meta-analysis on task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (task-fMRI) data. While MACM stands as a powerful automated tool for constructing robust models of whole-brain human functional connectivity, its inherent limitation lies in its inability to capture the distinct interrelationships among multiple brain regions. Consequently, the connectivity patterns highlighted through MACM capture the direct relationship of the seed region with third brain regions, but also a (less informative) residual relationship between the third regions themselves. As a consequence of this, this technique does not allow to evaluate to what extent the observed connectivity pattern is really associated with the fact that the seed region is activated, or it just reflects spurious co-activations unrelated with it. In order to overcome this methodological gap, we introduce a meta-analytic Bayesian-based method, called meta-analytic connectivity perturbation analysis (MACPA), that allows to identify the unique contribution of a seed region in shaping whole-brain connectivity. We validate our method by analyzing one of the most complex and dynamic structures of the human brain, the amygdala, indicating that MACPA may be especially useful for delineating region-wise co-activation networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39718568What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.